Re: [Numpy-discussion] DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch

2012-12-17 Thread Travis Oliphant
Thanks Charles, for the reminder and for the well wishes. I added the suggested names as owners. I have no doubt you will all do very well for NumPy in the future as you have in the past. All the best, -Travis On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:50 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi Travis, >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch

2012-12-17 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 12/18/2012 08:06 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > On 12/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jason Grout wrote: >> On 12/16/12 11:07 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> There is a lot happening in my life right now and I am spread quite >>> thin among the various projects that I take an interest in.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch

2012-12-17 Thread Dag Sverre Seljebotn
On 12/18/2012 03:10 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 12/16/12 11:07 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> There is a lot happening in my life right now and I am spread quite >> thin among the various projects that I take an interest in. In >> particular, I am thrilled to publicly announce o

Re: [Numpy-discussion] www.numpy.org home page

2012-12-17 Thread Paul Ivanov
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal > wrote: >> Interesting -- I was asked to review the Numpy 1.5 Beginner's Guide, >> and I did read through the whole thing, and make notes, but never >> wrote up a full review. One

Re: [Numpy-discussion] DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch

2012-12-17 Thread Jason Grout
On 12/16/12 11:07 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Hello all, > > There is a lot happening in my life right now and I am spread quite > thin among the various projects that I take an interest in. In > particular, I am thrilled to publicly announce on this list that > Continuum Analytics has receive

Re: [Numpy-discussion] www.numpy.org home page

2012-12-17 Thread Paul Ivanov
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote: > Interesting -- I was asked to review the Numpy 1.5 Beginner's Guide, > and I did read through the whole thing, and make notes, but never > wrote up a full review. One reason is that I found it hard to motivate > myself to write

Re: [Numpy-discussion] www.numpy.org home page

2012-12-17 Thread Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 7:48 AM, klo wrote: >> "NumPy 1.5 Beginner's Guide", Ivan Idris, >> http://www.packtpub.com/numpy-1-5-using-real-world-examples-beginners-guide/book > Some reviews on first title: > > http://gael-varoquaux.info/blog/?p=161 > http://glowingpython.blogspot.com/2011/12/book-

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

2012-12-17 Thread Andrew Collette
I am not very familiar with the NumPy development and release strategy, but is there any chance this fix could be included in 1.7.0? https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2798 This is the source of a recently reported bug in h5py and there is nothing I can do to work around it without breaking othe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] DARPA funding for Blaze and passing the NumPy torch

2012-12-17 Thread Charles R Harris
Hi Travis, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Hello all, > > There is a lot happening in my life right now and I am spread quite thin > among the various projects that I take an interest in. In particular, I > am thrilled to publicly announce on this list that Continuu

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: pandas 0.10.0 released

2012-12-17 Thread Wes McKinney
hi all, I'm super excited to announce the pandas 0.10.0 release. This is a major release including a new high performance file reading engine with tons of new user-facing functionality as well, a bunch of work on the HDF5/PyTables integration layer, much-expanded Unicode support, a new option/conf

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

2012-12-17 Thread Frédéric Bastien
While we are at it, back-porting https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2730 Would give a good speed up for an LTS. I made a new PR that do this back-port: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2847 Fred On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, David Warde-Farley wrote: > A bit off-topic, but could so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

2012-12-17 Thread David Warde-Farley
A bit off-topic, but could someone have a look at https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/2699 and provide some feedback? If 1.7 is meant to be an LTS release, this would be a nice wart to have out of the way. The Travis failure was a spurious one that has since been fixed. On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 6:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

2012-12-17 Thread Frédéric Bastien
Hi, I added a new issue that is a regression about numpy.ndindex() that we already talked. But it was a duplicate[1], so I closed it. I think it got lost as the ticket wasn't marked for 1.7 milestone. Ccan someone do it? I don't have the right. This regression break something in Theano. We could

Re: [Numpy-discussion] required nose version.

2012-12-17 Thread Frédéric Bastien
This is fine for us. Frédéric On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > Looking at INSTALL.txt with an eye to updating it since we have dropped > Python 2.4 -2.5 support, it looks like we could update the nose version > also. The first version of nose to support Pyth

Re: [Numpy-discussion] On the difference of two positive definite matrices

2012-12-17 Thread denis
Charles R Harris gmail.com> writes: > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Virgil Stokes it.uu.se> wrote: > Suppose I have two positive definite matrices, A and B. Is it possible > to use U*D*U^T  factorizations of these matrices to obtain a numerically > stable result for their difference, A -