Re: [Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

2012-12-15 Thread Nathaniel Smith
#294 is a regression, so probably should be considered release critical. I can't tell if #2750 is a real problem or not. #378 looks serious, but afaict has actually been fixed even though the bug is still marked open? At least fixed in 1.7.x? On 15 Dec 2012 23:52, "Ondřej Čertík" wrote: > Hi, > >

[Numpy-discussion] Status of the 1.7 release

2012-12-15 Thread Ondřej Čertík
Hi, If you go to the issues for 1.7 and click "high priority": https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?labels=priority%3A+high&milestone=3&state=open you will see 3 issues as of right now. Two of those have PR attached. It's been a lot of work to get to this point and I'd like to thank all of you

Re: [Numpy-discussion] MKL licenses for core scientific Python projects

2012-12-15 Thread Aron Ahmadia
All open source software and research projects with numpy in the stack, including PyClaw and petsc4py. A On Saturday, December 15, 2012, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Aron Ahmadia > > > wrote: > >> Ralf, >> >> Does "performance testing" come under building/testin

[Numpy-discussion] [ANN] OpenOpt Suite release 0.43

2012-12-15 Thread Dmitrey
Hi all, I'm glad to inform you about new OpenOpt release 0.43 (2012-Dec-15): * interalg now can solve SNLE in 2nd mode (parameter dataHandling = "raw", before - only "sorted") * Many other improvements for interalg * Some improvements for FuncDesigner kernel * FuncDesigner ODE now has 3 argu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal to drop python 2.4 support in numpy 1.8

2012-12-15 Thread David Warde-Farley
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Time to raise this topic again. Opinions welcome. As you know from the pull request discussion, big +1 from me too. I'm also of the opinion with David C. and Brad that dropping 2.5 support would be a good thing too, as there's a lot of g

Re: [Numpy-discussion] MKL licenses for core scientific Python projects

2012-12-15 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Aron Ahmadia wrote: > Ralf, > > Does "performance testing" come under building/testing? > As long as it's for the project(s) that these licenses are for, and not for your own research. Would this be for PyClaw? Ralf > If so, > > Aron Ahmadia > OS X.8 > > Thank

Re: [Numpy-discussion] MKL licenses for core scientific Python projects

2012-12-15 Thread Aron Ahmadia
Ralf, Does "performance testing" come under building/testing? If so, Aron Ahmadia OS X.8 Thanks, A On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < > chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > >> Ralf, >> >> Do these licenses al

Re: [Numpy-discussion] MKL licenses for core scientific Python projects

2012-12-15 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote: > Ralf, > > Do these licenses allow fully free distribution of binaries? And are those > binaries themselves redistributive? I.e. with py2exe and friends? > > If so, that could be nice. > Good point. It's