#294 is a regression, so probably should be considered release critical. I
can't tell if #2750 is a real problem or not. #378 looks serious, but
afaict has actually been fixed even though the bug is still marked open? At
least fixed in 1.7.x?
On 15 Dec 2012 23:52, "Ondřej Čertík" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
If you go to the issues for 1.7 and click "high priority":
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues?labels=priority%3A+high&milestone=3&state=open
you will see 3 issues as of right now. Two of those have PR attached.
It's been a lot of work
to get to this point and I'd like to thank all of you
All open source software and research projects with numpy in the stack,
including PyClaw and petsc4py.
A
On Saturday, December 15, 2012, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Aron Ahmadia
>
> > wrote:
>
>> Ralf,
>>
>> Does "performance testing" come under building/testin
Hi all,
I'm glad to inform you about new OpenOpt release 0.43 (2012-Dec-15):
* interalg now can solve SNLE in 2nd mode (parameter dataHandling =
"raw", before - only "sorted")
* Many other improvements for interalg
* Some improvements for FuncDesigner kernel
* FuncDesigner ODE now has 3 argu
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> Time to raise this topic again. Opinions welcome.
As you know from the pull request discussion, big +1 from me too. I'm
also of the opinion with David C. and Brad that dropping 2.5 support
would be a good thing too, as there's a lot of g
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Aron Ahmadia wrote:
> Ralf,
>
> Does "performance testing" come under building/testing?
>
As long as it's for the project(s) that these licenses are for, and not for
your own research. Would this be for PyClaw?
Ralf
> If so,
>
> Aron Ahmadia
> OS X.8
>
> Thank
Ralf,
Does "performance testing" come under building/testing?
If so,
Aron Ahmadia
OS X.8
Thanks,
A
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
> chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
>
>> Ralf,
>>
>> Do these licenses al
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
chris.bar...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> Ralf,
>
> Do these licenses allow fully free distribution of binaries? And are those
> binaries themselves redistributive? I.e. with py2exe and friends?
>
> If so, that could be nice.
>
Good point. It's