Re: [Numpy-discussion] In case anybody wants them: py4science.* domains...

2012-11-27 Thread Anthony Scopatz
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Peter Cock wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Anthony Scopatz > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Fernando Perez > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Peter Cock > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Perhaps http://numfocus.org/ could take the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] In case anybody wants them: py4science.* domains...

2012-11-27 Thread Peter Cock
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Anthony Scopatz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Fernando Perez > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Peter Cock >> wrote: >> >> > Perhaps http://numfocus.org/ could take them on, or the PSF? >> > (even if they don't have a specific use in mind

Re: [Numpy-discussion] In case anybody wants them: py4science.* domains...

2012-11-27 Thread Anthony Scopatz
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Fernando Perez wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Peter Cock > wrote: > > > Perhaps http://numfocus.org/ could take them on, or the PSF? > > (even if they don't have a specific use in mind immediately) > > For the short them I'd just have them redirect to w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] In case anybody wants them: py4science.* domains...

2012-11-27 Thread Fernando Perez
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Peter Cock wrote: > Perhaps http://numfocus.org/ could take them on, or the PSF? > (even if they don't have a specific use in mind immediately) > For the short them I'd just have them redirect to www.scipy.org ;) I asked on the numfocus list and nobody was really

Re: [Numpy-discussion] result shape from dot for 0d, 1d, 2d scalar

2012-11-27 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 13:54 -0500, Skipper Seabold wrote: > I discovered this because scipy.optimize.fmin_powell appears to > squeeze 1d argmin to 0d unlike the other optimizers, but that's a > different story. > > > I would expect the 0d array to behave like the 1d array not the 2d as > it does

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy on Travis with Python 3

2012-11-27 Thread Christoph Deil
Hi Tom, you can start reading here: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/2761#issuecomment-10672029 :-) Christoph On Nov 27, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Thomas Robitaille wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm currently having issues with installing Numpy 1.6.2 with Python > 3.1 and 3.2 using pip in Travis b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy on Travis with Python 3

2012-11-27 Thread Peter Cock
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Thomas Robitaille wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm currently having issues with installing Numpy 1.6.2 with Python > 3.1 and 3.2 using pip in Travis builds - see for example: > > https://travis-ci.org/astropy/astropy/jobs/3379866 > > The build aborts with a cryptic m

[Numpy-discussion] Numpy on Travis with Python 3

2012-11-27 Thread Thomas Robitaille
Hi everyone, I'm currently having issues with installing Numpy 1.6.2 with Python 3.1 and 3.2 using pip in Travis builds - see for example: https://travis-ci.org/astropy/astropy/jobs/3379866 The build aborts with a cryptic message: ValueError: underlying buffer has been detached Has anyone seen