On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
>> Le lundi 30 juillet 2012 à 11:07 -0700, Ondřej Čertík a écrit :
>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
>>> > Le lundi 30 juillet 2012 à 17:10 +0100, Ronan Lamy a écrit :
Responding to both Dag and David,
> OpenMP is pretty widespread in supercomputing, and so is OpenMP +
> multiple threads using LAPACK at the same time. This does NOT sound like
> any issue with multiprocessing to me.
>
These are built on dynamic thread-level (pthreads), not process-level
(multip
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Stefan Krah wrote:
> Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Stefan Krah
>> wrote:
>> > switch (descr->byteorder) {
>> > case '<':
>> > byteorder = -1;
>> > case '>':
>> > byteorder = 1;
>> >
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Aron Ahmadia wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Apple's response here is somewhat confusing, but I will add that on the
> supercomputing side of things we rarely fork, as this is not well-supported
> from the vendors or the hardware (it's hard enough to performantly spawn
> 50
On 08/04/2012 01:14 PM, Aron Ahmadia wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Apple's response here is somewhat confusing, but I will add that on the
> supercomputing side of things we rarely fork, as this is not
> well-supported from the vendors or the hardware (it's hard enough to
> performantly spawn 500,000 proc
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Stefan Krah
> wrote:
> > switch (descr->byteorder) {
> > case '<':
> > byteorder = -1;
> > case '>':
> > byteorder = 1;
> > default: /* '=', '|' */
> > byteorder = 0;
> >
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Stefan Krah wrote:
> switch (descr->byteorder) {
> case '<':
> byteorder = -1;
> case '>':
> byteorder = 1;
> default: /* '=', '|' */
> byteorder = 0;
> }
I think you might want some break
Hi David,
Apple's response here is somewhat confusing, but I will add that on the
supercomputing side of things we rarely fork, as this is not well-supported
from the vendors or the hardware (it's hard enough to performantly spawn
500,000 processes statically, doing this dynamically becomes even m
Hi,
During last PyCon, Olivier Grisel (from scikits-learn fame) and myself
looked into a nasty bug on mac os x: https://gist.github.com/2027412.
The short story is that I believe this means numpy cannot be used with
multiprocessing if linked against accelerate framework, and as such we
should thin
Travis Oliphant wrote:
> The difficulty starts when you start to interact with the unicode array
> scalar (which is the same data-structure exactly as a Python unicode object
> with a different type-name --- numpy.unicode_).However, I overlooked the
> "encoding" argument to the standard "un
10 matches
Mail list logo
