Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.complex

2012-07-21 Thread Nathaniel Smith
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:44 PM, OC wrote: > Thank you for your answers. > > Chris Barker wrote: > > for consistency with the rest of the numpy types > > Then, why do "numpy.complex64(A)", "numpy.complex128(A)", > "numpy.uint8(A)",... all work with arrays? It's very convenient that it > works lik

[Numpy-discussion] numpy.complex

2012-07-21 Thread OC
Thank you for your answers. Chris Barker wrote: > for consistency with the rest of the numpy types Then, why do "numpy.complex64(A)", "numpy.complex128(A)", "numpy.uint8(A)",... all work with arrays? It's very convenient that it works like this! It's awkward that "numpy.complex(A)" is the only