On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Travis and I ag
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to merge the following pull requests sometime today:
>>>
>>> * 326 -- inplace increment function
Hi Ralf,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I managed to compile NumPy in MinGW under Wine in Ubuntu 11.10 and
>> here is a full log of the tests:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/3135607
>>
>> It fails
On Jul 17, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> Not that there are likely to be people using skip_header=True as an
> alias for skip_header=1, but if they were it would currently work.
I write messy code like that all the time.
Best,
Travis
__
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:29 PM, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Travis Oliphant
>> wrote:
>> > I don't have a strong preference. Which one do others prefer?
>> >
>>
>> We've used 2) in the past, and I
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I managed to compile NumPy in MinGW under Wine in Ubuntu 11.10 and
> here is a full log of the tests:
>
> https://gist.github.com/3135607
>
> It fails at the test test_str (test_arrayprint.TestComplexArray) with
> a segfault like this
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:29 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> > I don't have a strong preference. Which one do others prefer?
> >
>
> We've used 2) in the past, and I don't think Ralf changed this when he
> took over release maintenance.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I don't have a strong preference. Which one do others prefer?
>
We've used 2) in the past, and I don't think Ralf changed this when he
took over release maintenance.
David
___
NumPy-Discussion
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Ondřej Čertík
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:22 PM, John Salvatier
>>> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile numpy on Wind
On 18 July 2012 15:14, Molinaro Céline
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In [2]: numpy.real(arange(3))
> Out[2]: array([0, 1, 2])
> In [3]: numpy.complex(arange(3))
> TypeError: only length-1 arrays can be converted to Python scalars
I think you're looking for the dtype keyword to the ndarray constructor:
imp
I don't have a strong preference. Which one do others prefer?
Travis
--
Travis Oliphant
(on a mobile)
512-826-7480
On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> We are going to work on a beta release on
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> We are going to work on a beta release on the 1.7.x branch.The master is
> open again for changes for 1.8.x. There will be some work on the 1.7.x
> branch to fix bugs including bugs that are already reported but have
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Now things work and start compiling. Any ideas what is going on here?
> Why is it trying to "build the msvcr" library?
I believe that it's actually trying to link to the msvcr library
(which requires first creating some file that describes
A.S.: Some forewords, below the first paragraphs are annotated after I got to
the conclusion at the end of the email; read these annotation in square
brackets as if it were footnotes. The main point to grasp and keep in mind for
me was, when it comes to package hierarchies, that "import package.
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 15:14 +0200, Molinaro Céline wrote:
> In [2]: numpy.real(arange(3))
> Out[2]: array([0, 1, 2])
> In [3]: numpy.complex(arange(3))
> TypeError: only length-1 arrays can be converted to Python scalars
>
>
> Are there any reasons why numpy.complex doesn't work on arrays?
> Shou
Hello,
In [2]: numpy.real(arange(3))
Out[2]: array([0, 1, 2])
In [3]: numpy.complex(arange(3))
TypeError: only length-1 arrays can be converted to Python scalars
Are there any reasons why numpy.complex doesn't work on arrays?
Should it be bug reported?
Thanks for your help
C. Molinaro
Hi,
I managed to compile NumPy in MinGW under Wine in Ubuntu 11.10 and
here is a full log of the tests:
https://gist.github.com/3135607
It fails at the test test_str (test_arrayprint.TestComplexArray) with
a segfault like this:
test_str (test_arrayprint.TestComplexArray) ... wine: Unhandled pa
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:22 PM, John Salvatier
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to compile numpy on Windows 7 using the command: "python setup.py
>>> config --compiler=ming
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 8:22 PM, John Salvatier
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to compile numpy on Windows 7 using the command: "python setup.py
>> config --compiler=mingw32 build" but I get an error about a symbol table not
>> found. An
19 matches
Mail list logo
