Re: [Numpy-discussion] Code Freeze for NumPy 1.7

2012-07-14 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute > changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Matrix rank default tolerance - is it too low?

2012-07-14 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tuesda

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Code Freeze for NumPy 1.7

2012-07-14 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > Hey all, > > We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute > changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them as > soon as possible. > > I'm proposing a code-freeze at midnight UT

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extracting sub-fields from an array as a view (PR 350)

2012-07-14 Thread Anthony Scopatz
+1 for more views. I agree with Fred about bundling the changes together. On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote: > I think it is better that we bundle those change together. As it is > done for diagonal, doing it for this case as fine too. > > Fred > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Code Freeze for NumPy 1.7

2012-07-14 Thread Frédéric Bastien
A very small PR about documentation: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/332 Fred On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > Hey all, > > We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute > changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should dis

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Extracting sub-fields from an array as a view (PR 350)

2012-07-14 Thread Frédéric Bastien
I think it is better that we bundle those change together. As it is done for diagonal, doing it for this case as fine too. Fred On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > > In https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/350/files , > > javius provides a patch to allow field extraction fr

[Numpy-discussion] Code Freeze for NumPy 1.7

2012-07-14 Thread Travis Oliphant
Hey all, We are nearing a code-freeze for NumPy 1.7. Are there any last-minute changes people are wanting to push into NumPy 1.7? We should discuss them as soon as possible. I'm proposing a code-freeze at midnight UTC on July 18th (7:00pm CDT on July 17th). This will allow the creation

[Numpy-discussion] Extracting sub-fields from an array as a view (PR 350)

2012-07-14 Thread Travis Oliphant
In https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/350/files , javius provides a patch to allow field extraction from a structured array to return a view instead of a copy.Generally, this is consistent with the desire to have NumPy return views whenever it can. The same idea underlies the change t

[Numpy-discussion] New Python tool for searching maximum stable set of a graph

2012-07-14 Thread Dmitrey
Hi all, In the OpenOpt software (BSD-licensed, http://openopt.org ) we have implemented new class - STAB - searching for maximum stable set of a graph. networkx graphs are used as input arguments. Unlike networkx maximum_independent_set() we focus on searching for exact solution (this is NP-Ha