On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Chao YUE wrote:
> Thanks all for the discussion. Actually I am trying to use something like
> numpy ndarray indexing in the function. Like when I call:
>
> func(a,'1:3,:,2:4'), it knows I want to retrieve a[1:3,:,2:4], and
> func(a,'1:3,:,4') for a[1:3,:,4] ect.
> I am
Thanks all for the discussion. Actually I am trying to use something like
numpy ndarray indexing in the function. Like when I call:
func(a,'1:3,:,2:4'), it knows I want to retrieve a[1:3,:,2:4], and
func(a,'1:3,:,4') for a[1:3,:,4] ect.
I am very close now.
#so this function changes the string to
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Chao YUE wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> it helps a lot. I am nearly finishing a function in a way I think
> pythonic.
> Just one more question, I have:
>
> In [24]: b=np.arange(1,11)
>
> In [25]: b
> Out[25]: array([ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10])
>
> In [26]: b[sl
On 07/12/2012 04:46 PM, Chao YUE wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> it helps a lot. I am nearly finishing a function in a way I think
> pythonic.
> Just one more question, I have:
>
> In [24]: b=np.arange(1,11)
>
> In [25]: b
> Out[25]: array([ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10])
>
> In [26]: b[slice(1)]
>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Chao YUE wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> it helps a lot. I am nearly finishing a function in a way I think pythonic.
> Just one more question, I have:
>
> In [24]: b=np.arange(1,11)
>
> In [25]: b
> Out[25]: array([ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10])
>
> In [26]: b[slice
Hi Ben,
it helps a lot. I am nearly finishing a function in a way I think pythonic.
Just one more question, I have:
In [24]: b=np.arange(1,11)
In [25]: b
Out[25]: array([ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10])
In [26]: b[slice(1)]
Out[26]: array([1])
In [27]: b[slice(4)]
Out[27]: array([1, 2,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Chao YUE wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to create a function and I would like one of the arguments of the
> function to determine what slicing of numpy array I want to use.
> a simple example:
>
> a=np.arange(100).reshape(10,10)
>
> suppose I want to have a imaging
Dear all,
I want to create a function and I would like one of the arguments of the
function to determine what slicing of numpy array I want to use.
a simple example:
a=np.arange(100).reshape(10,10)
suppose I want to have a imaging function to show image of part of this
data:
def show_part_of_da
On 7/12/2012 1:45 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> I'd actually like to see out= as a kw-only arg.
That would be great.
Numpy 2.0?
Alan Isaac
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discuss
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've been bitten several times by this.
>
> logical_or (a, b, c)
>
> is silently accepted when I really meant
>
> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>
> because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
>
> Dunno if anyt
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've been bitten several times by this.
>
> logical_or (a, b, c)
>
> is silently accepted when I really meant
>
> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>
> because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
>
> Dunno if any
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 16:21 +0100, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Henry Gomersall
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> I've been bitten several times by this.
> >>
> >> logical_or (a, b, c)
> >>
> >> is silently accepted when I really m
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Henry Gomersall wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I've been bitten several times by this.
>>
>> logical_or (a, b, c)
>>
>> is silently accepted when I really meant
>>
>> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>>
>> because the logic funct
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:53 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> I've been bitten several times by this.
>
> logical_or (a, b, c)
>
> is silently accepted when I really meant
>
> logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
>
> because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be
> m-ary.
I don't
I've been bitten several times by this.
logical_or (a, b, c)
is silently accepted when I really meant
logical_or (logical_or (a, b), c)
because the logic functions are binary, where I expected them to be m-ary.
Dunno if anything can be done about it.
Sure would like it if they were m-ary and
Hi,
* Charles R Harris [2012-07-12]:
> Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current 1.7.x
> branch and branch again after a code freeze. That way we can avoid the pain
> and potential errors of backports. It is considered bad form to mess with
> public repositories that w
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root
> >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
> >> > wrote:
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Travis and I a
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current
>> > 1.7.x
>> > branch
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
> > wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current
> 1.7.x
> > branch and branch again after a code freeze. That way we can avoid the
> pain
>
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Charles R Harris <
>> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones
>>> wrote
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Charles R Harris <
> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Al
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Travis and I agree that it would be appropriate to remove the current
>> 1.7.x
>> > b
Hi guys,
I have been trying to compile numpy 1.6.2 with the ACML4.4.0 on our AMD
based cluster.
I mainly followed some guides but most likely outdated like this one:
http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/attachment/ticket/740/acml2.log
I have compiled CBLAS linked with ACML4.4.0 gfortran, and it appe
23 matches
Mail list logo
