Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-24 Thread Travis Oliphant
On Jun 23, 2012, at 7:12 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > What has been done in the past is that an intent to fork is announced some > > two weeks in advance so that pe

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-24 Thread Travis Oliphant
On Jun 23, 2012, at 4:23 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> What has been done in the past is that an intent to fork is announced some >> two weeks in advance so that people can weigh in on what needs to be done >> before the fork. The i

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-24 Thread Travis Oliphant
> > What has been done in the past is that an intent to fork is announced some > two weeks in advance so that people can weigh in on what needs to be done > before the fork. The immediate fork was a bit hasty. Likewise, when I > suggested going to the github issue tracking, I opened a discussi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Issue tracking

2012-06-24 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Ralf Gommers > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jun