Re: [Numpy-discussion] Good way to develop numpy as popular choice!

2012-06-21 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:59:09PM -0400, Benjamin Root wrote: > > munkres seems to be a pure python implementation ;-). > Oops! I could have sworn that I once tried one named munkres that used > numpy. But that was several years ago. >There is a development branch of sk-learn

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Good way to develop numpy as popular choice!

2012-06-21 Thread Benjamin Root
On Thursday, June 21, 2012, Robert Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, eat > > wrote: > > Heh, > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Robert Kern > > > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, bob tnur > >> > > wrote: > >> > Hi all numpy fun;) > >> > This question is alre

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Good way to develop numpy as popular choice!

2012-06-21 Thread Robert Kern
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:33 PM, eat wrote: > Heh, > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Robert Kern wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, bob tnur wrote: >> > Hi all numpy fun;) >> > This question is already posted in stackoverflow by some people, I am >> > just >> > thinking that numpy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Travis Oliphant > > wrote: > >> > >> I thought it was clear we were doing a 1.7 release before SciPy. It > >> seems pretty urgent that we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Wes McKinney
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Travis Oliphant > wrote: >> >> I thought it was clear we were doing a 1.7 release before SciPy.   It >> seems pretty urgent that we get something out sooner than later.      I know >> there is never enough

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > I thought it was clear we were doing a 1.7 release before SciPy. It > seems pretty urgent that we get something out sooner than later. I > know there is never enough time to do all the things we want to do. > > There is time before t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > >> >> One particularly glaring example to my lens on the world: I think it >> would have been better to define new macros which require semicolons than >> changing the macros

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Good way to develop numpy as popular choice!

2012-06-21 Thread eat
Heh, On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, bob tnur wrote: > > Hi all numpy fun;) > > This question is already posted in stackoverflow by some people, I am > just > > thinking that numpy python will do this with trick;) I guess numpy will > be >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > I thought it was clear we were doing a 1.7 release before SciPy. It > seems pretty urgent that we get something out sooner than later. I > know there is never enough time to do all the things we want to do. > > The usual practice is

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Travis Oliphant
I thought it was clear we were doing a 1.7 release before SciPy. It seems pretty urgent that we get something out sooner than later. I know there is never enough time to do all the things we want to do. There is time before the first Release candidate to make changes on the 1.7.x branc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Good way to develop numpy as popular choice!

2012-06-21 Thread Robert Kern
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, bob tnur wrote: > Hi all numpy fun;) > This question is already posted in stackoverflow by some people, I am just > thinking that numpy python will do this with trick;) I guess numpy will be > every ones choice as its popularity increases. The question is herein: >

[Numpy-discussion] Good way to develop numpy as popular choice!

2012-06-21 Thread bob tnur
Hi all numpy fun;) This question is already posted in stackoverflow by some people, I am just thinking that numpy python will do this with trick;) I guess numpy will be every ones choice as its popularity increases. The question is herein: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10074270/how-can-i-find-

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I made a branch called with_maskna and then merged Nathaniel's PR which >> removes the mask_na support from master. I then applied a patch to fix the >> bool

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Charles R Harris
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote: > Hey all, > > I made a branch called with_maskna and then merged Nathaniel's PR which > removes the mask_na support from master. I then applied a patch to fix the > boolean indexing problem reported by Ralf. > > I then created a NumPy 1.7.x

[Numpy-discussion] "can cast safely" table

2012-06-21 Thread Pierre Haessig
Hi, While getting through the ufunc documentation, (http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy-docs/reference/ufuncs.rst/) I took the liberty to change one line in the code segment which generates the "can cast safely" table. I wanted to increase the readability if the table by increasing its contrast

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Pierre Haessig
Hi, Glad to see that 1.7 is coming soon ! Le 21/06/2012 12:11, Travis Oliphant a écrit : > NumPy 1.7 is a significant release and has several changes many of which are > documented in the release notes. I browsed the sources on github and ended up here : https://github.com/numpy/numpy/tree/mai

Re: [Numpy-discussion] trivial question?

2012-06-21 Thread Neal Becker
Robert Kern wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Maybe I'm being slow, but is there any convenient function to calculate, >> for 2 vectors: >> >> \sum_i \sum_j x_i y_j >> >> (I had a matrix once, but it vanished without a trace) > > np.multiply.outer(x, y).sum() > I

[Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

2012-06-21 Thread Travis Oliphant
Hey all, I made a branch called with_maskna and then merged Nathaniel's PR which removes the mask_na support from master. I then applied a patch to fix the boolean indexing problem reported by Ralf. I then created a NumPy 1.7.x maintenance branch from which the release of NumPy 1.7 will b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Bizarre errors with byteswapping, complex256, PPC

2012-06-21 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Brett >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >>