On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Bryan Van de Ven wrote:
> On 6/13/12 1:12 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Yes, of course we *could* write the code to implement these "open"
>> dtypes, and then write the documentation, examples, tutorials, etc. to
>> help people work around their limitations. Or, w
On Jun 17, 2012 9:37 PM, "David Cournapeau" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, N
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>> It looks like the levels can only be strings. This is too limited for
>>> my needs. Why not support all possible NumPy dtypes
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:20 PM, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> > Just submitted this pull request for
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>> It looks like the levels can only be strings. This is too limited for
>> my needs. Why not support all possible NumPy dtypes? In pandas world,
>> the levels can be any unique Index ob
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> It looks like the levels can only be strings. This is too limited for
> my needs. Why not support all possible NumPy dtypes? In pandas world,
> the levels can be any unique Index object
It seems like there are three obvious options, from most
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 201