On one of my papers, we put up the code online. Years afterwards, I still get
emails every six months or so because the version of the code which was used
for the paper now returns the wrong result!
The problem is that it was written for the old histogram and, although I have
a new version of the
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Kathleen M Tacina <
kathleen.m.tac...@nasa.gov> wrote:
> **
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 17:31 -0500, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:> To be clear, I'm not opposed to the change, and it looks like we
> should go f
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 17:31 -0500, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> > To be clear, I'm not opposed to the change, and it looks like we should go
> > forward.
> >
> > In my mind it's not about developers vs. users as satisfying users is the
> >
Hello,
I am pleased to announce the release of Enthought Python Distribution, EPD
version 7.3, along with its "EPD Free" counterpart. The highlights of this
release are: the addition of enaml, Shapely and several other packages,
as well as updates to over 30 packages, including SciPy and IPython.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> To be clear, I'm not opposed to the change, and it looks like we should go
> forward.
>
> In my mind it's not about developers vs. users as satisfying users is the
> whole point. The purpose of NumPy is not to make its developers happy
To be clear, I'm not opposed to the change, and it looks like we should go
forward.
In my mind it's not about developers vs. users as satisfying users is the whole
point. The purpose of NumPy is not to make its developers happy :-). But,
users also want there to *be* developers on NumPy
2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smith
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> > Then are you suggesting that we need to back out the changes to the
> casting
> > rules as well, because this will also cause code to stop working. This
> is
> > part of my point. We are not being consi
Thanks Olivier. it works.
chao
2012/5/23 Olivier Delalleau
> Should be dt3.compressed()
>
> -=- Olivier
>
> 2012/5/23 Chao YUE
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> is there a command for retrieving unmasked data from a mask array?
>> excepting using dt3[~dt3.mask].flatten()?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Chao
>>
>> --
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Then are you suggesting that we need to back out the changes to the casting
> rules as well, because this will also cause code to stop working. This is
> part of my point. We are not being consistently cautious.
I never understood exac
23.05.2012 11:22, shbr kirjoitti:
> I am running the following script as a basic input-output model but the
> inverse function is bringing back an incorrect result (I have checked this
> by inputting the data manually).I am very new to python but I assume the
> error occurs in how the data is gathe
On 05/23/2012 10:00 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 07:29 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> On May 23, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smithmailto:n...@pobox.com>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant
>>> mailto:tra.
On 05/23/2012 07:29 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
>
>> 2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smith mailto:n...@pobox.com>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant
>> mailto:tra...@continuum.io>> wrote:
>> > I just realized that the pul
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> Then are you suggesting that we need to back out the changes to the casting
> rules as well, because this will also cause code to stop working. This is
> part of my point. We are not being consistently cautious.
The casting change ha
2012/5/23 Travis Oliphant
>
> On May 23, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
>
> 2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smith
>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant
>> wrote:
>> > I just realized that the pull request doesn't do what I thought it did
>> which
>> > is just add the flag to war
On May 23, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Olivier Delalleau wrote:
> 2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smith
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> > I just realized that the pull request doesn't do what I thought it did which
> > is just add the flag to warn users who are writing to an array that is
The "private" libnpysort.a (see https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/89
for its history) uses PyDataMem_NEW/FREE. I'm trying to convert these
to actual functions to allow tracing numpy memory allocations (see
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/284).
However, these new functions have to be in the
Should be dt3.compressed()
-=- Olivier
2012/5/23 Chao YUE
> Dear all,
>
> is there a command for retrieving unmasked data from a mask array?
> excepting using dt3[~dt3.mask].flatten()?
>
> thanks,
>
> Chao
>
> --
>
> *
Dear all,
is there a command for retrieving unmasked data from a mask array?
excepting using dt3[~dt3.mask].flatten()?
thanks,
Chao
--
***
Chao YUE
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE-IP
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Frédéric Bastien wrote:
> +1
>
> Don't forget that many user always update to each version. So they
> will skip many version. This is especially true for people that rely
> on the distribution package that skip many version when they update.
> So this is not just a
+1
Don't forget that many user always update to each version. So they
will skip many version. This is especially true for people that rely
on the distribution package that skip many version when they update.
So this is not just a question of how many version we warn/err, but
also how many times we
2012/5/23 Nathaniel Smith
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> > I just realized that the pull request doesn't do what I thought it did
> which
> > is just add the flag to warn users who are writing to an array that is a
> > view when it used to be a copy. It's more
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I just realized that the pull request doesn't do what I thought it did which
> is just add the flag to warn users who are writing to an array that is a
> view when it used to be a copy. It's more cautious and also "copies" the
> data fo
I am running the following script as a basic input-output model but the
inverse function is bringing back an incorrect result (I have checked this
by inputting the data manually).I am very new to python but I assume the
error occurs in how the data is gathered from the csv but I don’t know how
to
23 matches
Mail list logo
