On May 12, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> On May 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
Your thoughts are definitely the f
On Saturday, May 12, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Another approach would be to introduce a method:
>
> a.diag(copy=False)
>
> and leave a.diagonal() alone. Then, a.diagonal() could be deprecated over
> 2-3 releases.
>
> -Travis
>
+1
Ben Root
>
___
On 05/05/2012 12:15 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate
> of NumPy 1.6.2. This is a maintenance release. Due to the delay of the
> NumPy 1.7.0, this release contains far more fixes than a regular NumPy
> bugfix release. It also
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>> Your thoughts are definitely the future. We are currently building such a
>>> thing. We would like it
Another approach would be to introduce a method:
a.diag(copy=False)
and leave a.diagonal() alone. Then, a.diagonal() could be deprecated over 2-3
releases.
-Travis
On May 12, 2012, at 8:31 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, M
On May 12, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> Your thoughts are definitely the future. We are currently building such a
>> thing. We would like it to be open source.We are currently preparing a
>> proposal to DAR
Hi,
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> Your thoughts are definitely the future. We are currently building such a
> thing. We would like it to be open source. We are currently preparing a
> proposal to DARPA as part of their XDATA proposal in order to help fund this
>
> I think the long-term generality is a lot bigger than that:
>
> - Compressed arrays
> - Interfaces to HDF files
> - Distributed-memory arrays
> - Blocked arrays
> - Semi-sparse and sparse (diagonal, but also triangular, symmetric,
> repeating, ...)
> - Lazy evaluation: "generating_mult
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <
d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
> > On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
> >> (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really*
> believe
> >> in it, I think
On 05/11/2012 03:37 PM, mark florisson wrote:
> On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe
>> in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not
>> going to be without manpower; and as hi
On 05/12/2012 11:35 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 03:25 PM, mark florisson wrote:
>> On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>> (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe
>>> in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F
On 05/11/2012 03:25 PM, mark florisson wrote:
> On 11 May 2012 12:13, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really* believe
>> in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes it it's not
>> going to be without manpower; and as hi
On 05/11/2012 10:10 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> mailto:d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no>> wrote:
>
> (NumPy devs: I know, I get too many ideas. But this time I *really*
> believe in it, I think this is going to be *huge*. And if Mark F. likes
>
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
> paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting a couple of errors when testing. System:
>> Arch Linux (updated today)
>> Python 3.2.3
>> gcc 4.7.0
>> (Anything else
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate
> of
> > NumPy 1.6.2. This is a maintenance release. Due to the delay of the
> NumPy
> >
On 05/12/2012 05:34 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 12.05.2012 17:30, Thomas Unterthiner kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> However it didn't seem to work. The same 5000x5000 matrix-multiply is
>> still spinning at 100% CPU usage. I attached to the process after I let
>> it run for over 3 minutes, and the stacktra
Hello,
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate of
> NumPy 1.6.2. This is a maintenance release. Due to the delay of the NumPy
> 1.7.0, this release contains far more fixes than a regular NumPy bugfix
>
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Paul Anton Letnes <
> paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm getting a couple of errors when testing. System:
>> Arch Linux (updated today)
>> Python 3.2.3
>> gcc 4.7.0
>> (Anything else
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Derek Homeier <
de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> On 06.05.2012, at 8:16AM, Paul Anton Letnes wrote:
>
> > All tests for 1.6.2rc1 pass on
> > Mac OS X 10.7.3
> > python 2.7.2
> > gcc 4.2 (Apple)
>
> Passing as well on 10.6 x86_64 and on 10.5.8 ppc with
12.05.2012 17:30, Thomas Unterthiner kirjoitti:
[clip]
> However it didn't seem to work. The same 5000x5000 matrix-multiply is
> still spinning at 100% CPU usage. I attached to the process after I let
> it run for over 3 minutes, and the stacktrace looked like this:
>
> #0 DOUBLE_dot (ip1=, is1=8
On 05/12/2012 04:00 PM, Matthieu Brucher wrote:
Does ACML now provide a CBLAS interface?
Matthieu
D'oh!
Very good point, I wasn't aware that numpy needed a CLBAS interface. I
now followed the steps outlined at the end of
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2006-February/018379
Does ACML now provide a CBLAS interface?
Matthieu
2012/5/12 Thomas Unterthiner
>
> On 05/12/2012 03:27 PM, numpy-discussion-requ...@scipy.org wrote:
> > 12.05.2012 00:54, Thomas Unterthiner kirjoitti:
> > [clip]
> >> > The process will have 100% CPU usage and will not show any activity
> >> >
On 05/12/2012 03:27 PM, numpy-discussion-requ...@scipy.org wrote:
> 12.05.2012 00:54, Thomas Unterthiner kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> > The process will have 100% CPU usage and will not show any activity
>> > under strace. A gdb backtrace looks as follows:
>> >
>> > (gdb) bt
>> > #0 0x7fdcc00
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:26 PM, T J wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 11.05.2012 17:54, Frédéric Bastien kirjoitti:
> >>> > In The
12.05.2012 00:54, Thomas Unterthiner kirjoitti:
[clip]
> The process will have 100% CPU usage and will not show any activity
> under strace. A gdb backtrace looks as follows:
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x7fdcc000e524 in ?? ()
> from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/numpy/core/multiarray.so
[clip]
On 2012-05-11, at 4:01 PM, Norman Shelley wrote:
> Running on Linux RHEL4
>
> numpy.random.multivariate_normal seems to work well for 25 mean
> values but when I go to 26 mean values (and their corresponding
> covariance values) it produces garbage.
> Any ideas?
The implementation of multiv
26 matches
Mail list logo
