On Apr 26, 2012, at 10:29 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Stéfan van de
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:59 PM, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2012, at 6:01 PM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Charles R Harris
> Patches languishing on Trac is a real problem. The issue here is not at all
> about not wanting those patches,
Oh yes I am sure of that, in the past it had not been clear what more
is necessary to get them pulled in, or how to go about satisfying the
requirements. The document you mailed on the
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
>
> >> Perhaps a more formal "development release" system could help here.
> >> IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things:
>
> > This is a good idea - not for development releases but for master.
>
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Ralf Gommers
>> Perhaps a more formal "development release" system could help here.
>> IIUC, numpy pretty much has two things:
> This is a good idea - not for development releases but for master. Building
> nightly/weekly binaries would help more people try out n
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:37 AM, srean wrote:
>
> On something else that was brought up: I do not consider myself
> competent/prepared enough to take on development, but it is not the
> case that I have _never_ felt the temptation. What I have found
> intimidating and styming is the perceived pol
We're kind of drifting again here, but...
Remember when all this discussion happened on usenet? Perhaps we're in
yet another awkward transition period and soon all email list-type
discussions will be on Github, Bitbucket, StackOverflow (e.g. pandas),
etc.
There's advantages and disadvantages to a
From: eat
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)
Thanks, this was useful. For a large cube, though, I had to loop through the
indices
of the maxima:
for i in np.arange(0,
