On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>> It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.
>> Is that even possible?
>>
>> -Travis
>>
>
> This ha been a concern of mine for matplotlib as well. The closest I can
> come is to set up an RSS feed, but all the tit
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list. Is
>> that even possible?
>
> That is definitely possible and shouldn't be too hard to do,
On 4/25/12 11:08 PM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.Is
>> that even possible?
>
> That is definitely possible and shouldn't be too hard to do, like
> Jason s
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
[snip]
>
> It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list. Is
> that even possible?
That is definitely possible and shouldn't be too hard to do, like
Jason said. But that can potentially cause some confusion, with
On 4/25/12 8:11 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
>> pretty boring.
>> The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
>> there are many
>> dev
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
> > pretty boring.
> > The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
> > ther
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
> pretty boring.
> The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
> there are many
> developers really interested in commenting on code and
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
>>> wrote:
>
> Do you agree that Numpy has not been ver
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
> >> maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
> >>
> >> Compared to - say
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
>> process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
>> more diffi
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
> >
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
> >> maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
> >>
> >> Compared to - say
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
>>> maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
>>>
>>> Compared to - say - Sympy?
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>>
>> Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
>> maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
>>
>> Compared to - say - Sympy?
>>
>> Why do you think this is?
>
> I think it's mostly because
>
> Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
> maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
>
> Compared to - say - Sympy?
>
> Why do you think this is?
I think it's mostly because it's infrastructure that is a means to an end. I
certainly wasn't
I too have to agree with Andreas. I have been using Numpy for years in my
work, but am not versed in C so I don't even understand what numpy is doing
under the hood. I too would only be able to contribute to the code at the
python level, or as Andreas said, at improving SciPy packages and other
N
On 4/25/2012 4:51 PM, Andreas H. wrote:
> I would assume that most users see numpy
> as infrastructure, they write their own code on top of it. As a normal
> user of numpy, I wouldn't know where it would need improvement to suit
> my needs because it already does all I need. (Okay, masked arrays ar
> Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
> maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
>
> Compared to - say - Sympy?
>
> Why do you think this is?
I don't know about SymPy. But in my view (and I'm just a typical user of
NumPy), numpy seems to be a
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
> process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
> more difficult and instead of opening up the process, closes it down. There
> i
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Till Stensitzki wrote:
> Hello,
> is there weighted version of linalg.lstsq available?
> In my case, b is a (N,K) matrix, so i can't use manual scaling of x and b.
>
What shape are the weights in this case? I'm not that familiar with
problems with an N x K b matr
>
> I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
> process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
> more difficult and instead of opening up the process, closes it down. There
> is less freedom, not more. That is one of the reasons that
Hello,
is there weighted version of linalg.lstsq available?
In my case, b is a (N,K) matrix, so i can't use manual scaling of x and b.
greetings
Till
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/nu
The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
topics - too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't
spotted yet. Perhaps that's because it's flat out wrong, or crazy, or just
too awkward to be helpful. But ...
Shouldn't masked arrays (MA) be a superclas
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
> That is one of the reasons that the smaller
> scikits attract people, they have more freedom to do what they want and
> fewer people to answer to. Scipy also has some of that advantage because
> there are a number of packages to choose fro
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:03:25AM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> Well, you have already appealed to the authority of greater experience, so
> it's a bit late to declare disinterest in the subject ;) I mean, at this
> point I really would like to see how big your FOSS is.
Chuck, I am not sure th
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
> >> wrote:
> >> > I admit to a certain curios
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> > I admit to a certain curiosity about your own involvement in FOSS
>> > projects,
>> > and I know I'm not
27 matches
Mail list logo
