Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Char

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers < >>> ralf.gomm..

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What is consensus anyway

2012-04-22 Thread Fernando Perez
Hi Nathaniel, thanks for a solid writeup of this topic. I just want to add a note from personal experience, regarding this specific point: On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Usually disagreements are an indication that a > better solution is possible, even when it's not c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP mask code and the 1.7 release

2012-04-22 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in >> master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it >> is, we don't actually have c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NEP mask code and the 1.7 release

2012-04-22 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in > master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it > is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to > give our users what they wan

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What is consensus anyway

2012-04-22 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word "consensus" > come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently > dissolved itself in favor of governance "directly by the consensus of > the people active in glibc

[Numpy-discussion] What is consensus anyway

2012-04-22 Thread Nathaniel Smith
If you hang around big FOSS projects, you'll see the word "consensus" come up a lot. For example, the glibc steering committee recently dissolved itself in favor of governance "directly by the consensus of the people active in glibc development"[1]. It's the governing rule of the IETF, which define

[Numpy-discussion] NEP mask code and the 1.7 release

2012-04-22 Thread Nathaniel Smith
We need to decide what to do with the NA masking code currently in master, vis-a-vis the 1.7 release. While this code is great at what it is, we don't actually have consensus yet that it's the best way to give our users what they want/need -- or even an appropriate way. So we need to figure out how

[Numpy-discussion] the state of NA/masking

2012-04-22 Thread Nathaniel Smith
Hi all, Travis, Mark, and I talked on Skype this week about how to productively move forward with the NA debate, and I got picked to summarize for the list :-). There are three main things we discussed: 1) About process: We seem to agree that this discussion has been ineffective for a variety of

[Numpy-discussion] Euroscipy 2012 - abstract deadline soon (April 30) + sprints

2012-04-22 Thread Emmanuelle Gouillart
Hello, this is a reminder of the approaching deadline for abstract submission at the Euroscipy 2012 conference: the deadline is April 30, in one week. Euroscipy 2012 will be held in **Brussels**, **August 23-27**, at the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB, Solbosch Campus). The EuroSciPy meetin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers < >>> ralf.gomm..

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers < >> ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Charl

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A 1.6.2 release?

2012-04-22 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Charles R Harris < >> charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Given the amount of new stuff coming in 1.7 and the sli

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Removing masked arrays for 1.7? (Was 1.7 blockers)

2012-04-22 Thread Paul Anton Letnes
On 21. apr. 2012, at 00:16, Drew Frank wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Chris Barker wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> wrote: >>> Oh, right. I was thinking "small" as in "fits in L2 cache", not small as >>> in a few dozen entries. > > Another exa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] (no subject)

2012-04-22 Thread eat
Hi, On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Andre Martel wrote: > What would be the best way to remove the maximum from a cube and > "collapse" the remaining elements along the z-axis ? > For example, I want to reduce Cube to NewCube: > > >>> Cube > array([[[ 13, 2, 3, 42], > [ 5, 100,