On 19 January 2012 21:48, Fernando Perez wrote:
> We've moved to the following setup with ipython, which works very well
> for us so far:
>
> 1. ipython.org: Main website with only static content, manged as a
> repo in github (https://github.com/ipython/ipython-website) and
> updated with a gh-pag
On Thursday, January 19, 2012, Ruby Stevenson wrote:
> hi, all
>
> I am a newbie on numpy ... I am trying to figure out, given an array,
> how to get back position value based on some conditions.
> Say, array([1, 0, 0, 0 1], and I want to get a list of indices where
> it is none-zero, [ 0 , 4 ]
>
hi, all
I am a newbie on numpy ... I am trying to figure out, given an array,
how to get back position value based on some conditions.
Say, array([1, 0, 0, 0 1], and I want to get a list of indices where
it is none-zero, [ 0 , 4 ]
The closest thing I can find from the doc is select(), but I can't
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Ognen Duzlevski wrote:
> ipython.org used to live on scipy.org machine - as far as I can tell
> the only thing still on the scipy.org machine related to ipython are
> the dev and user mailing lists (via mailman) hosted at
> projects.scipy.org.
Yup, we've now move
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 19.01.2012 18:21, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
>> I think the problem here is one of delegation and information.
>>
>> I'm not even sure how the web-pages get updated at this point.
>> Does anyone on this list know? I think it would be a grea
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>> I'm not even sure how the web-pages get updated at this point. Does anyone
>> on this list know? I think it would be a great idea to move to github
>> pages for the NumPy pro
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> I'm not even sure how the web-pages get updated at this point. Does anyone
> on this list know? I think it would be a great idea to move to github
> pages for the NumPy project at least.
We've moved to the following setup with ipyth
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Mark Bakker wrote:
> I noticed that swapaxes(0,1) is consistently (on my system) 10% faster than
> transpose on a 2D matrix.
Transpose is faster for me. And a.T is faster than a.transpose()
perhaps because a.transpose() checks that the inputs make sense? My
guess
19.01.2012 18:21, Travis Oliphant kirjoitti:
> I think the problem here is one of delegation and information.
>
> I'm not even sure how the web-pages get updated at this point.
> Does anyone on this list know? I think it would be a great idea
> to move to github pages for the NumPy project at lea
I think the problem here is one of delegation and information.
I'm not even sure how the web-pages get updated at this point. Does anyone on
this list know?I think it would be a great idea to move to github pages for
the NumPy project at least.
-Travis
On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:39 AM, Fer
Hello List,
I noticed that swapaxes(0,1) is consistently (on my system) 10% faster than
transpose on a 2D matrix.
Any reason why? Any reason why the swapaxes algorithm is not used in
transpose?
Just wondering. Thanks,
Mark
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing
2012/1/18 Chao YUE :
> Does anybody know if there is similar chance for training in Paris? (or
> other places of France)/
> the price is nice, just because it's in US
The next EuroScipy will take place in Brussels. Just 1h25m train ride
from Paris.
http://www.euroscipy.org/conference/eurosc
On 01/18/2012 08:54 PM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick email to advertise this year's PyCon tutorials as they
> are very focused on HPC& data analytics. In particular the numpy /
> scipy ecosystem is well covered, see:
>
>https://us.pycon.org/2012/schedule/tutorials/
>
> Here
13 matches
Mail list logo
