On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Nathan Faggian wrote:
> I am interested in the use of numpy with native python objects, like so:
>
> In [91]: import collections
> In [92]: testContainer = collections.namedtuple('testContainer', 'att1
> att2 att3')
> In [93]: test1 = testContainer(1, 2, 3)
> In [9
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 16:55, Gael Varoquaux
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:46:52PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>>> My question was more along the lines of "why doesn't numpy do the online
>>> algorithm".
>>
>> It's probably a
On 11/15/2011 07:03 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:57:14PM +, Robert Kern wrote:
>> Actually, last time I suggested it, it was brought up that the online
>> algorithms can be worse numerically. I'll try to find the thread.
> Indeed, especially for smallish datasets where
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:57:14PM +, Robert Kern wrote:
> Actually, last time I suggested it, it was brought up that the online
> algorithms can be worse numerically. I'll try to find the thread.
Indeed, especially for smallish datasets where the memory overhead is not
an issue. I think that
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 16:55, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:46:52PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>> My question was more along the lines of "why doesn't numpy do the online
>> algorithm".
>
> It's probably a matter of nobody having had the time and the urge to code
> it
On 11/14/11 2:02 PM, Andrea Zonca wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:24, Chris.Barker wrote:
On 11/11/11 8:28 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
I once wrote a generic n-dimensional binning routine in C that I
could find if anyone is interested in integrating it into numpy... it
didn't do size increases
On 11/15/2011 06:02 PM, Warren Weckesser wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Andreas Müller
mailto:amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de>> wrote:
On 11/15/2011 05:46 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:28 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
On 11/14/2011 10:05 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> **
> On 11/15/2011 05:46 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>
> On 11/15/2011 04:28 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2011 10:05 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2011 04:23 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 05:46:52PM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>My question was more along the lines of "why doesn't numpy do the online
>algorithm".
It's probably a matter of nobody having had the time and the urge to code
it, _and_ do all the extra steps necessary to integrate to the co
On 11/15/2011 05:46 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On 11/15/2011 04:28 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
On 11/14/2011 10:05 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On 11/14/2011 04:23 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
Hi everybody.
When I did some normalization using
On 11/15/2011 04:28 PM, Bruce Southey wrote:
On 11/14/2011 10:05 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On 11/14/2011 04:23 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
Hi everybody.
When I did some normalization using numpy, I noticed that numpy.std uses
more ram
From: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org
[mailto:numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Delalleau
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:02 AM
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.int32 is not subclass of int, but
numpy.int64 is
2011/11/15 MA
On 11/14/2011 10:05 AM, Andreas Müller wrote:
On 11/14/2011 04:23 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
Hi everybody.
When I did some normalization using numpy, I noticed that numpy.std uses
more ram than I was expecting.
A quick google search ga
2011/11/15 MACKEITH Andrew
> *From:* numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org [mailto:
> numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org] *On Behalf Of *Olivier Delalleau
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 15, 2011 7:03 AM
> *To:* Discussion of Numerical Python
> *Subject:* Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.int32 is not subc
From: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org
[mailto:numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Delalleau
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 7:03 AM
To: Discussion of Numerical Python
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy.int32 is not subclass of int, but
numpy.int64 is
2011/11/14 Robert
2011/11/14 Robert Kern
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 20:18, MACKEITH Andrew
> wrote:
> > Could someone explain this?
> >
> > An instance of numpy.int32 is not an instance of int or numpy.int.
> > An instance of numpy.int64 is an instance of int and numpy.int.
> >
> > I don't know if it is a bug in m
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:51 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, David Cournapeau
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett
>>> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 13,
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:08 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Charles R Harris
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011
18 matches
Mail list logo
