There is also:
Missing/accumulating data
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-July/057406.html
An NA compromise idea -- many-NA
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2011-July/057408.html
NEPaNEP lessons - was: alterNEP
http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion
On 10/25/2011 04:56 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> So, I am very interested in making sure I remember the details of the
> counterproposal.What I recall is that you wanted to be able to
> differentiate between a "bit-pattern" mask and a boolean-array mask
> in the API. I believe currently even
So, I am very interested in making sure I remember the details of the
counterproposal.What I recall is that you wanted to be able to
differentiate between a "bit-pattern" mask and a boolean-array mask in the API.
I believe currently even when bit-pattern masks are implemented the
differen
Many thanks Oliver!
i missed it in the description,
works great :-)
--Massimo.
Il giorno 25/ott/2011, alle ore 15.33, Olivier Delalleau ha scritto:
> Maybe try genfromtxt instead of loadtxt, it has a skip_footer option.
>
> -=- Olivier
>
> 2011/10/25 Massimo Di Stefano
> i'm tring to genera
Hi,
Thank you for your gracious email.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
> It is a shame that Nathaniel and perhaps Matthew do not feel like their
> voice was heard. I wish I could have participated more fully in some of
> the discussions. I don't know if I could have re
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>>> 25.10.2011 20:29, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
>>> [clip]
In [7]: (res-1) / 2**32
Out[7]: 858993
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> 25.10.2011 20:29, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
>> [clip]
>>> In [7]: (res-1) / 2**32
>>> Out[7]: 8589934591.98
>>>
>>> In [8]: np.float((res-1) / 2**32)
>>> Out[8]: 42949
It is a shame that Nathaniel and perhaps Matthew do not feel like their voice
was heard. I wish I could have participated more fully in some of the
discussions. I don't know if I could have really helped, but I would have
liked to have tried to perhaps work alongside Mark to integrate some of
Matthew Brett writes:
[...]
>>> If we do value constructive disagreement then we'll go out of our way
>>> to talk through the points of contention, and make sure that the
>>> people who disagree, especially the minority, feel that they have been
>>> fully heard.
>>>
>>> If we don't value construct
Maybe try genfromtxt instead of loadtxt, it has a skip_footer option.
-=- Olivier
2011/10/25 Massimo Di Stefano
> i'm tring to generate an array reading a txt file from internet.
>
> my target is to use python instead of matlab, to replace this steps in
> matlab :
>
> url=['http://www.cdc.noaa.
i'm tring to generate an array reading a txt file from internet.
my target is to use python instead of matlab, to replace this steps in matlab :
url=['http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/Correlation/amon.us.long.data'];
urlwrite(url,'file.txt');
i'm using this code :
urllib.urlretrieve('http://www.cdc.noaa
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 25.10.2011 20:29, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> In [7]: (res-1) / 2**32
>> Out[7]: 8589934591.98
>>
>> In [8]: np.float((res-1) / 2**32)
>> Out[8]: 4294967296.0
>
> Looks like a bug in the C library installed on the mach
Hi,
On 25 Oct 2011, at 21:14, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 25.10.2011 20:29, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>> In [7]: (res-1) / 2**32
>> Out[7]: 8589934591.98
>>
>> In [8]: np.float((res-1) / 2**32)
>> Out[8]: 4294967296.0
>
> Looks like a bug in the C library installed on the machine, t
25.10.2011 20:29, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
[clip]
> In [7]: (res-1) / 2**32
> Out[7]: 8589934591.98
>
> In [8]: np.float((res-1) / 2**32)
> Out[8]: 4294967296.0
Looks like a bug in the C library installed on the machine, then.
It's either in wontfix territory for us, or in the "cast to do
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Derek Homeier
wrote:
> On 25 Oct 2011, at 20:05, Matthew Brett wrote:
>
Both the same as numpy:
[mb312@jerry ~]$ gcc test.c
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function
'po
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Lluís wrote:
>> > Matthew Brett writes:
>> >> I'm afraid I find this whole thread very unpleasant.
>> >
>> >> I have the odd impr
On 25 Oct 2011, at 20:05, Matthew Brett wrote:
>>> Both the same as numpy:
>>>
>>> [mb312@jerry ~]$ gcc test.c
>>> test.c: In function 'main':
>>> test.c:5: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function
>>> 'powl'
>>
>> I think implicit here means that that the arguments and th
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 25.10.2011 19:45, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
> [clip]
>>> or, in case the platform doesn't have powl:
>>>
>>> long double x;
>>> x = pow(2, 64);
>>> x -= 1;
>>> printf("%g %Lg\n", (double)x, x);
>>
>> Both
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Lluís wrote:
> > Matthew Brett writes:
> >> I'm afraid I find this whole thread very unpleasant.
> >
> >> I have the odd impression of being back at high school. Some of the
> >> big kids are pushing
25.10.2011 19:45, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
[clip]
>> or, in case the platform doesn't have powl:
>>
>> long double x;
>> x = pow(2, 64);
>> x -= 1;
>> printf("%g %Lg\n", (double)x, x);
>
> Both the same as numpy:
>
> [mb312@jerry ~]$ gcc test.c
> test.c: In function
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>>> > 25.10.2011 06:59, Matt
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> > 25.10.2011 06:59, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
>> >> res = np.longdouble(2)**64
>> >> res-1
>> >>
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Lluís wrote:
> Matthew Brett writes:
>> I'm afraid I find this whole thread very unpleasant.
>
>> I have the odd impression of being back at high school. Some of the
>> big kids are pushing me around and then the other kids join in.
>
>> It didn't have to be
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> > 25.10.2011 06:59, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
> >> res = np.longdouble(2)**64
> >> res-1
> >> 36893488147419103231.0
> >
> > Can you check if long double works properly (not a
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> 25.10.2011 06:59, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
>> res = np.longdouble(2)**64
>> res-1
>> 36893488147419103231.0
>
> Can you check if long double works properly (not a given) in C on that
> platform:
>
> long double x;
> x = po
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just ran into this on a PPC machine:
>>
>> In [1]: import numpy as np
>>
>> In [2]: np.__version__
>> Out[2]: '2.0.0.dev-4daf949'
>>
>> In [3]: res = np.l
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:54 PM, David Voong wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a question regarding subclassing of the numpy.matrix class.
>
> I read through the wiki page,
> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/user/basics.subclassing.html
>
> and tried to subclass numpy.matrix, I find that if I override
Matthew Brett writes:
> I'm afraid I find this whole thread very unpleasant.
> I have the odd impression of being back at high school. Some of the
> big kids are pushing me around and then the other kids join in.
> It didn't have to be this way.
> Someone could have replied like this to Nathani
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just ran into this on a PPC machine:
>
> In [1]: import numpy as np
>
> In [2]: np.__version__
> Out[2]: '2.0.0.dev-4daf949'
>
> In [3]: res = np.longdouble(2)**64
>
> In [4]: res
> Out[4]: 18446744073709551616.0
>
> In [5]: 2**64
Finally managed to use PyArrayNeighborhoodIter_Next2D with numpy 1.5.0 (in
numpy 1.6 it doesn't get along with halffloat). Benchmark results (not the same
computer and parameters I used in the previous benchmark):
1. ...Next2D (zero padding, it doesn't accept mirror padding): 10 sec
2. ...Next (z
25.10.2011 06:59, Matthew Brett kirjoitti:
> res = np.longdouble(2)**64
> res-1
> 36893488147419103231.0
Can you check if long double works properly (not a given) in C on that
platform:
long double x;
x = powl(2, 64);
x -= 1;
printf("%g %Lg\n", (double)x, x);
or,
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Han Genuit wrote:
> Well, if I may have a say, I think that an open source project is
> especially open when users as developers can contribute to the code
> base and can participate in discussions on how to improve the existing
> designs and ideas. I do not
32 matches
Mail list logo
