Re: [Numpy-discussion] fate of array interface

2011-07-18 Thread Robert Kern
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:10, Sam Quinan wrote: > As I got no response to my original email, I figured I'd ask one more time > just in case somebody who could answer my question(s) missed it the first > time... > > Is array_interface actually being deprecated in favor of PEP 3118? No. > The num

Re: [Numpy-discussion] fate of array interface

2011-07-18 Thread Sam Quinan
As I got no response to my original email, I figured I'd ask one more time just in case somebody who could answer my question(s) missed it the first time... Is array_interface actually being deprecated in favor of PEP 3118? If so, when? Are there eventual plans for python-side buffer specificatio

[Numpy-discussion] Your NumPy application on a Computer Cluster in the Cloud - cloudnumbers.com

2011-07-18 Thread Markus Schmidberger
Dear NumPy users and experts, cloudnumbers.com provides researchers and companies with the access to resources to perform high performance calculations in the cloud. As cloudnumbers.com's community manager I may invite you to register and test your Python application on a computer cluster in the c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] PyBUF_SIMPLE requests

2011-07-18 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Sat, 16 Jul 2011 12:42:36 +0200, Stefan Krah wrote: > x = ndarray(buffer=bytearray([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]), > shape=[10], strides=[-1], dtype="B", offset=9) [clip] > I do not understand the PyBUF_SIMPLE result. According to the C-API docs > a consumer would be allowed to access buf[9],