On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2011 09:45:12 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> [clip]
> > These are generated by the .. autosummary:: command, so the error
> > probably lies there.
>
> The problem is that the signature of these routines is written as
>
>
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2011 09:45:12 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> [clip]
> > These are generated by the .. autosummary:: command, so the error
> > probably lies there.
>
> The problem is that the signature of these routines is written as
>
>
On Sat, 14 May 2011 09:45:12 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
[clip]
> These are generated by the .. autosummary:: command, so the error
> probably lies there.
The problem is that the signature of these routines is written as
remainder(x1, x2[, out])
and not as
remainder(x1, x2, o
A number of the ufuncs in the reference doc are missing arguments, for
example
remainder(x1) Return element-wise remainder of division.
mod(x1) Return element-wise remainder of division.
fmod(x1) Return the element-wise remainder of division.
absolute() Calculate the absolute value element-wise.
r
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.6.0. This release is the
> result of 9 months of work, and includes many new features, performance
> improvements and bug fixes. Some highlights are:
>
> - Re-introduction of datetime d
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the release of NumPy 1.6.0. This release is the
result of 9 months of work, and includes many new features, performance
improvements and bug fixes. Some highlights are:
- Re-introduction of datetime dtype support to deal with dates in arrays.
- A new 16-bit floati
