Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > > >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", > >>> line 477, in open > >>> return _file_openers[ext](foun

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/11 9:03 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris >>>File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", >>> line 477, in open >>> return _file_openers[ext](found, mode=mode) >>> IOError: invalid mode: Ub >>> >> >> Guess that w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy >> 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this >> release, the beta testing phase will last

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On 4/4/2011 1:04 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any problems

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:03 AM, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> >>> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> >> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy >> > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive cha

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi all, On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please > test this beta and report any prob

[Numpy-discussion] ANN: Numpy 1.6.0 beta 2

Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please test this beta and report any problems on the Numpy mailing list. Many bug fixes went in si

Re: [Numpy-discussion] python3 setup.py install fails with git maint/1.6.x

On 4 Apr 2011, at 21:41, Darren Dale wrote: >> Just tried again with python3.2 and 1.6.0b2, installs fine. The line >> it fails on is only reached when a numpy/version.py exists, which is >> the case for source releases or if you did not clean your local git >> repo before building. > > ... but I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] python3 setup.py install fails with git maint/1.6.x

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > > I just checkout out the 1.6 branch, attempted to install with python3: > > I hope you mean the 1.6.0b1 tarball, not the current branch head? This > problem is (or should have been) fixed.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] python3 setup.py install fails with git maint/1.6.x

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Darren Dale wrote: >> I just checkout out the 1.6 branch, attempted to install with python3: > > I hope you mean the 1.6.0b1 tarball, not the current branch head? This > problem is (or should have been) fixed.

Re: [Numpy-discussion] python3 setup.py install fails with git maint/1.6.x

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Darren Dale wrote: > I just checkout out the 1.6 branch, attempted to install with python3: I hope you mean the 1.6.0b1 tarball, not the current branch head? This problem is (or should have been) fixed. Just tried again with python3.2 and 1.6.0b2, installs fine. T

Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to create structured char arrays?

Hi Bruce, > I think that I have resolved my issue down to creating a structured > string array. > I am using numpy version '2.0.0.dev-3c338cb'. > > Without a structured array, it should be a 2 by 2 array: np.array([('a','b'),('c','d')]) > array([['a', 'b'], >['c', 'd']], > dtype

[Numpy-discussion] "Best" dot product along an axis?

Going through some of the recent threads on similar problems, I'm trying to discern which is "best." I have X is T x i, theta is T x i x j. I want a T by j array that contains X[t].T.dot(theta[t]) along axis 0. Say, T,i,j = 166,7,3 X = np.random.random((T,i)) theta = np.random.random((T,i,j))

[Numpy-discussion] python3 setup.py install fails with git maint/1.6.x

I just checkout out the 1.6 branch, attempted to install with python3: RefactoringTool: Line 695: You should use a for loop here Running from numpy source directory.Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 196, in setup_package() File "setup.py", line 170, in setup_package

[Numpy-discussion] How to create structured char arrays?

Hi, I think that I have resolved my issue down to creating a structured string array. I am using numpy version '2.0.0.dev-3c338cb'. Without a structured array, it should be a 2 by 2 array: >>> np.array([('a','b'),('c','d')]) array([['a', 'b'], ['c', 'd']], dtype='|S1') >>> np.arr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] loadtxt/savetxt tickets

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Bruce Southey wrote: > On 04/04/2011 11:20 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Bruce Southey wrote: > >> On 03/31/2011 12:02 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: >> > On 31 Mar 2011, at 17:03, Bruce Southey wrote: >> > >> >> This is an inval

Re: [Numpy-discussion] loadtxt/savetxt tickets

On 04/04/2011 11:20 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Bruce Southey > wrote: On 03/31/2011 12:02 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: > On 31 Mar 2011, at 17:03, Bruce Southey wrote: > >> This is an invalid ticket because the docstring

Re: [Numpy-discussion] loadtxt/savetxt tickets

Y'all, Just a quick word before disappearing again: genfromtxt was designed to support files that don't have a well-defined structure (eg, the number and format of the column is unknown, some entries may be missing, and so forth). That was initially just an improved rec2csv from matplotlib back

Re: [Numpy-discussion] loadtxt/savetxt tickets

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Bruce Southey wrote: > On 03/31/2011 12:02 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: > > On 31 Mar 2011, at 17:03, Bruce Southey wrote: > > > >> This is an invalid ticket because the docstring clearly states that in > >> 3 different, yet critical places, that missing values are not

Re: [Numpy-discussion] loadtxt/savetxt tickets

On 03/31/2011 12:02 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: > On 31 Mar 2011, at 17:03, Bruce Southey wrote: > >> This is an invalid ticket because the docstring clearly states that in >> 3 different, yet critical places, that missing values are not handled >> here: >> >> "Each row in the text file must have the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Import patch

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paul Anton Letnes < > paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On 4. apr. 2011, at 16.42, Charles R Harris wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Paul Anton Letnes < >> paul.anton.let

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Import patch

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Paul Anton Letnes < paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4. apr. 2011, at 16.42, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Paul Anton Letnes < > paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 4. apr. 2011, at 15.34, Charles R Harris

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Import patch

On 4. apr. 2011, at 16.42, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Paul Anton Letnes > wrote: > > On 4. apr. 2011, at 15.34, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Paul Anton Letnes > > wrote: > > Hi. > > > > When looking at the loadtxt

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Import patch

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Paul Anton Letnes < paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4. apr. 2011, at 15.34, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Paul Anton Letnes < > paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi. > > > > When looking at the loadtxt/savetxt

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Import patch

On 4. apr. 2011, at 15.34, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Paul Anton Letnes > wrote: > Hi. > > When looking at the loadtxt/savetxt tickets, I noticed that the 're' module > is imported in an odd place. I therefore suggest that this import is moved to > the to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Import patch

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Paul Anton Letnes < paul.anton.let...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > When looking at the loadtxt/savetxt tickets, I noticed that the 're' module > is imported in an odd place. I therefore suggest that this import is moved > to the top of the file, in order to gather th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] division operator

On 4/4/2011 6:49 AM, Alex Ter-Sarkissov wrote: > divide(float(var1),float(var2)) http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.true_divide.html hth, Alan Isaac ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.or

Re: [Numpy-discussion] division operator

On 04/04/2011 01:49 PM, Alex Ter-Sarkissov wrote: > I have 2 variables, say var1=10,var2=100. To divide I do either > divide(float(var1),float(var2)) or simply float(var1)/float(var2). I'm > just wondering if there's a smarter way of doing this? >>> from __future__ import division >>> var1 = 1

Re: [Numpy-discussion] division operator

>>> var1 = 10 >>> var2 = 100 >>> import numpy as np >>> np.divide(var1,var2) 0 >>> np.divide(10,100 * 1.) 0.10001 >>> var1/var2 0 >>>var1*1./var2 0.1 On 04/04/2011, at 8:49 PM, Alex Ter-Sarkissov wrote: > I have 2 variables, say var1=10,var2=100. To divide I do either > divide(float

[Numpy-discussion] division operator

I have 2 variables, say var1=10,var2=100. To divide I do either divide(float(var1),float(var2)) or simply float(var1)/float(var2). I'm just wondering if there's a smarter way of doing this? ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http