On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Mark Wiebe wrote:
> Your changes look fine to me, and I think the tests are reasonable as is. I
> would suggest tidying up your commit messages a bit, creating an enhancement
> bug in the bug tracker, and making a pull request. Some info about the pull
> requests is
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Eli Stevens (Gmail)
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Eli Stevens (Gmail)
> > wrote:
> >> Next up for me is to get a patch onto the CPython issue tracker, but
> >> as soon as I have that done, I'
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 14:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 03/31/2011 01:12 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>>> Well, they're meant to be copied into your own code, which is why they
>>> end up under a doc/ directory. Lots of things like this tend to
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Whoosh!
>
> Ben Root
>
> P.S. -- In case it is needed to be said, that is 1e6 downloads from
> sourceforge only. NumPy is now on github...
The releases are still distributed through sourceforge.
Maybe the SciPy2011 Program Committee could p
Whoosh!
Ben Root
P.S. -- In case it is needed to be said, that is 1e6 downloads from
sourceforge only. NumPy is now on github...
Happy April Fools!
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> I think he is talking about 1e6 downloads total.
> -S.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:
I think he is talking about 1e6 downloads total.
-S.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Yeah, but they have been downhill since November...
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>>
>> Numpy is nearing a milestone:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Ralf Gommers
>> Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:31 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] np.histogramdd of empty data
>> To: Nil
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Visiting http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/, as search for
>
> as_strided
>
> or
>
> stride_tricks
>
> shows nothing (useful).
That's because as_strided is not exposed. It's a private function (see
commit f912322e) used in broadcast_arr
Yeah, but they have been downhill since November...
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> Numpy is nearing a milestone:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/stats/timeline?dates=2007-09-25+to+2011-04-01
> ___
> NumPy-Dis
Numpy is nearing a milestone:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/stats/timeline?dates=2007-09-25+to+2011-04-01
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Visiting http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/, as search for
as_strided
or
stride_tricks
shows nothing (useful).
For that matter, I don't see a reference to numpy.lib.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.sc
Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:15:08 -0700, Mark Wiebe wrote:
[clip]
> My reading of Pauli's thoughts was that putting it in unilaterally is
> undesirable, something I definitely agree with. I think with Eli doing
> the legwork of getting input and acceptance from the relevant parties,
> we should help him ou
12 matches
Mail list logo
