Re: [Numpy-discussion] Please help a newbie install NUMPY

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Jonathan Rocher wrote: > Hi, > > You might want to try using easy_install >> sudo easy_install numpy > > For some doc about it, see > http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall > easy_install really does not help to do a numpy install from source, and ma

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

2010/10/16 Stéfan van der Walt : > The idea is not to keep merging the master branch into your > development branch to keep up to date (this makes for really ugly > history). > > For single commits, merge back into master (hopefully this should be a > fast-forward merge), which then creates an svn-

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > I think the iPython development mailing list recently had a long discussion > about proper git usage.  Maybe there is something we can learn from their > experience? Here's the link again: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/ipython-dev/2010-O

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > IIRC, they recommended pushing from local branches to master on github and > not merging master to the development branches. That doesn't sound right to > me, but perhaps I misunderstood... The idea is not to keep merging the master br

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Joshua Holbrook < >> josh.holbr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Charles R Harr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Joshua Holbrook > wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > Here. This looks harmless but it makes the history really ugly. We need >> to >> > get the word out *n

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Joshua Holbrook wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Here. This looks harmless but it makes the history really ugly. We need > to > > get the word out *not* to do things this way. > > > > Chuck > > > > _

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Here. This looks harmless but it makes the history really ugly. We need to > get the word out *not* to do things this way. > > Chuck > > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@sc

[Numpy-discussion] Another merge at github

Here. This looks harmless but it makes the history really ugly. We need to get the word out *not* to do things this way. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorry, probably postponing Binary Release [urgent]

2010/10/16 Vincent Davis : > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Friedrich Romstedt > wrote: >> 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : >>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Friedrich Romstedt >>> wrote:  I need some spare of this for my exam on Monday.  I see two options: 1)  Vincent, if you

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorry, probably postponing Binary Release [urgent]

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : >> Hi Friedrich, >> >> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Friedrich Romstedt >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been working the past few days usually to somewhen between 1 and >>> 7 in the morning on the numpy bui

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorry, probably postponing Binary Release [urgent]

2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : > Hi Friedrich, > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Friedrich Romstedt > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been working the past few days usually to somewhen between 1 and >> 7 in the morning on the numpy build, but I feel at the end of my >> power. > > Thanks for working so har

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorry, probably postponing Binary Release [urgent]

Hi Friedrich, On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working the past few days usually to somewhen between 1 and > 7 in the morning on the numpy build, but I feel at the end of my > power. Thanks for working so hard, but please don't burn yourself out - w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Sorry, probably postponing Binary Release [urgent]

Addendum: Ralf, vpn? 2010/10/16 Friedrich Romstedt : > Hi, > > I've been working the past few days usually to somewhen between 1 and > 7 in the morning on the numpy build, but I feel at the end of my > power.  I need some spare of this for my exam on Monday.  I see two > options: > > 1)  Vincent,

[Numpy-discussion] Sorry, probably postponing Binary Release [urgent]

Hi, I've been working the past few days usually to somewhen between 1 and 7 in the morning on the numpy build, but I feel at the end of my power. I need some spare of this for my exam on Monday. I see two options: 1) Vincent, if you feel like, can you try to finish it on your own. Don't know .

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Vincent Davis wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org >> (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming >> scheme is needed for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi all, > > With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org > (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming > scheme is needed for the numpy binaries. That's assuming we provide > two correspondi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : >> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Friedrich Romstedt >> wrote: >>> 2)  I noticed that the paver at some late point tried to switch from >>> py2.5 to py2.6, what is rather strange to me.  I must have a look >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Friedrich Romstedt wrote: > 2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : >> With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org >> (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming >> scheme is needed for the numpy binaries. That's assuming we

Re: [Numpy-discussion] help from OS X 10.5 users wanted

2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Friedrich Romstedt > wrote: >> Here come now the interesting facts: >> >> 1)  Some tests of numpy failed in 2.0.0.dev.  When the machine is >> running again I can send the logs.  All some strange-looking typecode >> string tests with dty

Re: [Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

2010/10/16 Ralf Gommers : > With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org > (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming > scheme is needed for the numpy binaries. That's assuming we provide > two corresponding installers with the same arches. I pr

[Numpy-discussion] OS X installers - naming scheme and 2.7 annoyance

Hi all, With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming scheme is needed for the numpy binaries. That's assuming we provide two corresponding installers with the same arches. I propose the following: "num