Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Good-bye, sort of (John Hunter)

2010-08-14 Thread Gary Pajer
Similar situation here. Been Matlab-free for about ten years, but my new employer ... I started looking at the code, and my stomach sank when I first read if (nargin = 1) Oh, it hurts!! On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > @Josh: Awesome name. Very fitting... > > Another

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Good-bye, sort of (John Hunter)

2010-08-14 Thread josef . pktd
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Joshua Holbrook wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:48 PM,   wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Joshua Holbrook >> wrote: Cause honestly, If I could dump everything in one file and be able to use it everywhere. >>> >>> ...I could. >>> >>> Sorry. >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] [SciPy-Dev] Good-bye, sort of (John Hunter)

2010-08-14 Thread Joshua Holbrook
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 3:48 PM, wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Joshua Holbrook > wrote: >>> Cause honestly, If I could dump everything in one file and be able to >>> use it everywhere. >> >> ...I could. >> >> Sorry. > > The main thing I was missing in matlab are namespaces, everythin

Re: [Numpy-discussion] review request

2010-08-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd appreciate a review of these changes: >> http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5 >> http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/deprecations >> >> > Lo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] py3k execfile('setup.py')

2010-08-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:39:19 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > The execfile builtin has disappeared in python 3.x, so I'm trying to > > find another solution for the use of it in setupegg.py. So far I've > > tried > > I'd do something like this

Re: [Numpy-discussion] review request

2010-08-14 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Hi, > > I'd appreciate a review of these changes: > http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5 > http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/deprecations > > Looks good to me as far as I am familiar with things. Chuck ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] cython/swigpyrex examples and docs

2010-08-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > >> Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:22:33 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: >> > There is a bug report asking for the example files under doc/cython, >> > doc/swig etc. to be included in the released b

[Numpy-discussion] review request

2010-08-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi, I'd appreciate a review of these changes: http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/changes-for-1.5 http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/deprecations Thanks, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailma

[Numpy-discussion] 3K: fromfile/tofile errors on Windows

2010-08-14 Thread Ralf Gommers
== ERROR: test_multiarray.TestIO.test_ascii -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "Z:\Users\rgommers\.wine\drive_c\Python31\lib\site-packages\nose-3.0.0.dev-