I am way out of my element trying to build numpy on Windows, but we
are having a replicable (though somewhat inconsistently on some
machines) problem using fmin_cg on Windows that I am trying to debug.
I'm on Windows 7 64-bit with Python 2.6.4
First, I try to build numpy. It complains about havi
Sturla Molden wrote:
> Christopher Barker skrev:
>> However, Python lists hold python objects, so it's bit inefficient, at
>> least in terms of memory use.
>>
> I guess that is mainly in terms of memory use, as the Python (scalar)
> objects must be created for the call to append. np.array([]) can
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:00, Shailendra wrote:
> Hi All,
> I tried to use the decorator @numpy.vectorize for the class method
> without success. Can any one point me to the correct way of using it?
> I am able to use the numpy.vectorize() sucessfully.
> Below is the code with did not work
>
> ==
Hi All,
I tried to use the decorator @numpy.vectorize for the class method
without success. Can any one point me to the correct way of using it?
I am able to use the numpy.vectorize() sucessfully.
Below is the code with did not work
import numpy
class test:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:09:15 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> [clip]
> > PS, of course we should fix the macro also. Since the bit values of +/-
> > infinity are known we should be able to define them as constants using a
> > couple of ifdefs
Any good reason CompaqVisualFCompiler should raise an exception when I'm
not using it? Using Enthought 6.2-2.
Sturla
D:\test>f2py -c --fcompiler=absoft --compiler=msvc -m hello hello.f90
Forcing DISTUTILS_USE_SDK=1
Unexpected ValueError in
C:\Python26\lib\site-packages\numpy\distutils\fcompile
Christopher Barker skrev:
>
> However, Python lists hold python objects, so it's bit inefficient, at
> least in terms of memory use.
>
I guess that is mainly in terms of memory use, as the Python (scalar)
objects must be created for the call to append. np.array([]) can also be
inefficient, as An
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:00:09 -0400, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> (CCing NumPy-discussion where this really belongs)
>
> On 2010-07-08, at 1:34 PM, cfra...@uci.edu wrote:
>
>> Need Complex numbers in the saved file.
>
> Ack, this has come up several times according to list archives and no
> one's be
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:09:15 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
[clip]
> PS, of course we should fix the macro also. Since the bit values of +/-
> infinity are known we should be able to define them as constants using a
> couple of ifdefs and unions.
We already do that, NPY_INFINITY and -NPY_INFINITY.
[
Testing with arithmetic can raise overflows and underflows.
I think the correct isinf is to compare to NPY_INFINITY and -NPY_INFINITY.
Patch is attached to #1500
- Alkuperäinen viesti -
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:42 PM, John Hunter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Charles
10 matches
Mail list logo