John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Peter Isaac wrote:
>
>> Note that EPD-6.2-2 works fine with this script on WinXP.
>>
>
>
>> Any suggestions welcome
>>
>
> then just use epd-6.2.2 on winxp.
>
> your-mpl-developer-channeling-steve-jobs,
> JDH
>
>
> _
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Joshua Holbrook
> wrote:
>
>> I think I like being able to group ticks with their axis, so I know
>> which ticks belong to which axis without having to scan back-and-forth
>> between them to match them up. Do
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Joshua Holbrook wrote:
> I think I like being able to group ticks with their axis, so I know
> which ticks belong to which axis without having to scan back-and-forth
> between them to match them up. Do you think you can explain why you
> would prefer to separate la
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Peter Isaac wrote:
> Note that EPD-6.2-2 works fine with this script on WinXP.
> Any suggestions welcome
then just use epd-6.2.2 on winxp.
your-mpl-developer-channeling-steve-jobs,
JDH
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing lis
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Joshua Holbrook
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Christopher Barker
>>> wrote:
Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:05
hello fellow numpyneers,
I'm not sure if this is a problem with numpy, matplotlib, EPD or me but
here goes. The general problem is that either matplotlib has stopped
plotting masked arrays correctly or numpy has changed the way masked
arrays are presented. Or there is something strange with the
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Joshua Holbrook wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Christopher Barker
>> wrote:
>>> Keith Goodman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
> So what would you
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Christopher Barker
> wrote:
>> Keith Goodman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Christopher Barker
>>> wrote:
>>>
So what would you get if you wanted:
MyDataArray['jones':'wilson']
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
> Keith Goodman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Christopher Barker
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So what would you get if you wanted:
>>>
>>> MyDataArray['jones':'wilson']
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> MyDataArray.names[slice('jones','wilson')]
>>>
>>>
Keith Goodman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Christopher Barker
> wrote:
>
>> So what would you get if you wanted:
>>
>> MyDataArray['jones':'wilson']
>>
>> or
>>
>> MyDataArray.names[slice('jones','wilson')]
>>
>> or whatever the syntax would be?
>>
>> If it was in alphabetical order,
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Christopher Barker
wrote:
> So what would you get if you wanted:
>
> MyDataArray['jones':'wilson']
>
> or
>
> MyDataArray.names[slice('jones','wilson')]
>
> or whatever the syntax would be?
>
> If it was in alphabetical order, you'd be all set, but what it if
> was
Hi folks,
There has been a lot of great discussion about this -- and I"m really
glad to see it happening -- I've been putting off refactoring my own
lame, limited, poorly designed, special purpose version of this for ages.
One question I have (that may have been answered) is about slicing:
I t
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Rob Speer wrote:
> Keith Goodman wrote:
>> I ran into a few more questions while playing with datarrays, so I started a
>> list:
>> http://github.com/kwgoodman/datarrayQ
>
> I have quick answers to some of the questions.
Thank you! Comments below.
>> Can I have t
Keith Goodman wrote:
> I ran into a few more questions while playing with datarrays, so I started a
> list:
> http://github.com/kwgoodman/datarrayQ
I have quick answers to some of the questions.
> Can I have ticks without labels?
Ideally, yes, but good catch: the current code disallows that for
>> I was going to reply to it after I considered its contents but kinda
>> forgot until now.
>>
>> Anyways: while I like the idea of having ticks that correspond to
>> their axis being next to each other as the current behavior goes, I
>> find this alternative syntax easier to read, probably due to
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Joshua Holbrook wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Rob Speer wrote:
>> Now, the one part I've implemented that I just made up instead of
>> looking to the SciPy consensus (because there was no SciPy consensus)
>> was how to refer to multiple labeled axes wit
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Rob Speer wrote:
> Now, the one part I've implemented that I just made up instead of
> looking to the SciPy consensus (because there was no SciPy consensus)
> was how to refer to multiple labeled axes without repeating ".axis"
> all over the place. My choice, which
Now, the one part I've implemented that I just made up instead of
looking to the SciPy consensus (because there was no SciPy consensus)
was how to refer to multiple labeled axes without repeating ".axis"
all over the place. My choice, which I call "magical axis attributes",
is to have arr.somelabel
On 7/9/2010 7:11 AM, Peter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Jon Wright wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems that python 2.7 has been released, but the current numpy
>> download on sourceforge (1.4.1) segfaults for me using mingw on windows.
>> This seems to be fixed in trunk. Is a new rele
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Jon Wright wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It seems that python 2.7 has been released, but the current numpy
> download on sourceforge (1.4.1) segfaults for me using mingw on windows.
> This seems to be fixed in trunk. Is a new release planned in the near
> future?
>
> Thanks
Hello,
It seems that python 2.7 has been released, but the current numpy
download on sourceforge (1.4.1) segfaults for me using mingw on windows.
This seems to be fixed in trunk. Is a new release planned in the near
future?
Thanks
Jon
___
NumPy-Dis
Advanced Scientific Programming in Python
=
an Autumn School by the G-Node, the Center for Mind/Brain Sciences
and the Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Scientists spend more and more time writing, maintaining, and
debugging software. While techniques for doing this
Rob Speer writes:
> My implementation is still missing the case with named ticks but
> positional axes, however.
[...]
Just a quick hack: http://github.com/xscript/datarray
Lluis
--
"And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
something new, the whole world becomes tha
Hello list. The following subroutine fails to compile with f2py.
I use a complex variable with intent(inout). It works fine with two real
variables, so I have a workaround, but it would be nicer with a complex
variable.
Any thoughts on what I am doing wrong?
Thanks, Mark
module bessel
contains
24 matches
Mail list logo
