On 04/10/2010 03:02 AM, Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:25 AM, David wrote:
>> On 04/07/2010 11:52 AM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>>> Briefly, I'm encountering difficulties getting things working in numpy
>>> distutils for fwrap's build system.
>>>
>>> Here are the steps I want the build syste
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Kurt Smith wrote:
...
>>
>> So you could do something like the following to get the compiler flags:
>>
>> $ fwrap --get-cflags --fcompiler=intelem
>>
>> And it would spit out the flags necessary to include when compiling
>> the for
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 AM, russel wrote:
> Any chance of getting this into the next release?
>
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1122
>
> I marked it 0.8 because that was the default, but it is a very simple fix.
>
> Don't think so, sorry. If everything is OK then the final 0.7.2 wil
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
> congratulation to the new RC.
> Just for the record, where did you announce RC1 ? Only on numpy-dev ?
>
Since I'm new to this and wasn't sure it was all going to work right, I
announced rc1 only on scipy-dev (which in my mind i
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Sebastian Walter
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>
>> Hi Travis,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Travis Oliphant
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I should have some time over t
2010/4/10 Stéfan van der Walt :
> On 10 April 2010 19:45, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> Another addition to ufuncs that should be though about is specifying the
>> Python-side interface to generalized ufuncs.
>
> This is an interesting idea; what do you have in mind?
I can see two different kinds of a
Any chance of getting this into the next release?
http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1122
I marked it 0.8 because that was the default, but it is a very simple fix.
Russel
Sebastian Haase wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
> congratulation to the new RC.
> Just for the record, where did you announce RC1 ? O
Kurt Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> Kurt Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:25 AM, David wrote:
On 04/07/2010 11:52 AM, Kurt Smith wrote:
>
>>> Fortran's .mod files are essentially compiler-generated header files;
>>> fwrap needs to u
> Thanks Sebastian :).;But I think i will install Ubuntu on my system
> :)..nowWindow 7 is giving me kind of trouble ..i wasted whole
> night trying to make MiniGW 64 work for metoo much too do too little
> time...
>
> Hope installing Scipy And Numpy will be easy on Ubuntu
>
> T
Hi Ralf,
congratulation to the new RC.
Just for the record, where did you announce RC1 ? Only on numpy-dev ?
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> For SciPy there will be no 2.5 binaries -
> because 0.7.x is built against NumPy 1.2
Could you elaborate on this ? I thought the n
Hi Aki,
what version of python of are you using ? Are you using the standard
python.org Windows build ?
Most people here use cygwin only to build python extensions (from
source) - and use the numpy (currently version 1.3) and scipy from the
sourceforge download page. Look for "superpack" to get so
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> Hi Travis,
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Travis Oliphant
> wrote:
>
>
> I should have some time over the next couple of weeks, and I am very
>
> interested in refactoring the N
Hi,
I am pleased to announce the second release candidate of both Scipy 0.7.2
and NumPy 1.4.1, please test them.
The issues reported with rc1 should be fixed, and for NumPy there are now
Python 2.5 binaries as well. For SciPy there will be no 2.5 binaries -
because 0.7.x is built against NumPy 1.
13 matches
Mail list logo
