Re: [Numpy-discussion] take not respecting masked arrays?

2010-03-01 Thread Peter Shinners
On 02/28/2010 10:58 PM, Pierre GM wrote: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 1:02 AM, Peter Shinners wrote: > >>> Here is the code as I would like it to work. >>> >> http://python.pastebin.com/CsEnUrSa >> >> >> import numpy as np >> >> values = np.array((40, 18, 37, 9, 22)) >> index = np.arange(3)[Non

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Iterative Matrix Multiplication

2010-03-01 Thread Ian Mallett
Excellent--this setup works perfectly! In the areas I was concentrating on, the the speed increased an order of magnitude. However, the overall speed seems to have dropped. I believe this may be because the heavy indexing that follows on the result is slower in numpy. Is this a correct analysis?

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Iterative Matrix Multiplication

2010-03-01 Thread Chris Colbert
This is how I always do it: In [1]: import numpy as np In [3]: tmat = np.array([[0., 1., 0., 5.],[0., 0., 1., 3.],[1., 0., 0., 2.]]) In [4]: tmat Out[4]: array([[ 0., 1., 0., 5.], [ 0., 0., 1., 3.], [ 1., 0., 0., 2.]]) In [5]: points = np.random.random((5, 3)) In

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Snow Leopard Py-2.7a3 _init_posix issue; IO test segfault

2010-03-01 Thread Bruce Southey
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Tom Loredo wrote: > > Bruce Southey wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, David Warde-Farley > wrote: >> On 26-Feb-10, at 7:43 PM, Charles سمير Doutriaux >> wrote: >> >>> Any idea on how to build a pure 32bit numpy on snow leopard? >> >> If I'm not mistaken

Re: [Numpy-discussion] todos before 1.4.1 RC1

2010-03-01 Thread Jarrod Millman
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Here are some requests / things I think need to be done before a 1.4.1 RC1 > can be put out. > > 1. Bump up the version to 1.4.1 > 2. Update the release notes, including an explanation of why 1.4.0 was > pulled. > 3. Patrick and I need info on

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-api and masked arrays

2010-03-01 Thread Matt Knox
Martin Raspaud smhi.se> writes: > We are using at the moment a c extension which should manipulate masked > arrays. > What we do is to fill the masked array with a given value (say 65535 if we run > uint16 arrays), do the manipulation, and convert back to masked arrays when we > go back to pytho

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy & SciPy with Snow Leopard 64-bit Py-2.6.4

2010-03-01 Thread Nils Wagner
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:49:52 -0500 josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Tom Loredo > wrote: >> >> Just wanted to report qualified success installing NumPy >>& SciPy under >> a 64-bit build of Python-2.6.4 (universal framework) on >>OS X 10.6.2 >> (current Snow Leopard).

Re: [Numpy-discussion] NumPy & SciPy with Snow Leopard 64-bit Py-2.6.4

2010-03-01 Thread josef . pktd
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Tom Loredo wrote: > > Just wanted to report qualified success installing NumPy & SciPy under > a 64-bit build of Python-2.6.4 (universal framework) on OS X 10.6.2 > (current Snow Leopard).  I am using the current SVN checkouts > (numpy r8270, scipy r6250). > > NumPy

[Numpy-discussion] NumPy & SciPy with Snow Leopard 64-bit Py-2.6.4

2010-03-01 Thread Tom Loredo
Just wanted to report qualified success installing NumPy & SciPy under a 64-bit build of Python-2.6.4 (universal framework) on OS X 10.6.2 (current Snow Leopard). I am using the current SVN checkouts (numpy r8270, scipy r6250). NumPy has installed successfully for some time now and the current S

[Numpy-discussion] Snow Leopard Py-2.7a3 _init_posix issue; IO test segfault

2010-03-01 Thread Tom Loredo
Bruce Southey wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:59 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote: > On 26-Feb-10, at 7:43 PM, Charles سمير Doutriaux > wrote: > >> Any idea on how to build a pure 32bit numpy on snow leopard? > > If I'm not mistaken you'll probably want to build against the > Python.org Python rat

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Snow Leopard

2010-03-01 Thread Charles سمير Doutriaux
Thx David, Maybe i will have to try that as a temporary fix. But in the long run i do want to build my own Python. C. On Feb 26, 2010, at 4:59 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote: > On 26-Feb-10, at 7:43 PM, Charles سمير Doutriaux wrote: > >> Any idea on how to build a pure 32bit numpy on snow leopa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-api and masked arrays

2010-03-01 Thread Pierre GM
On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Martin Raspaud wrote: > Hi, > > We're talking map projections, so that means that the values will move around, > including masked ones... > > So filling the array with a given value is a way of projecting the array and > the > mask in one shot... OK then. Just make

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-api and masked arrays

2010-03-01 Thread Martin Raspaud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre GM skrev: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Martin Raspaud wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi all, >> >> We are using at the moment a c extension which should manipulate masked >> arrays. >> What we do is to fill t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] C-api and masked arrays

2010-03-01 Thread Pierre GM
On Mar 1, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Martin Raspaud wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > We are using at the moment a c extension which should manipulate masked > arrays. > What we do is to fill the masked array with a given value (say 65535 if we run > uint16 arrays)

[Numpy-discussion] C-api and masked arrays

2010-03-01 Thread Martin Raspaud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, We are using at the moment a c extension which should manipulate masked arrays. What we do is to fill the masked array with a given value (say 65535 if we run uint16 arrays), do the manipulation, and convert back to masked arrays when we go ba

[Numpy-discussion] todos before 1.4.1 RC1

2010-03-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
Hi all, Here are some requests / things I think need to be done before a 1.4.1 RC1 can be put out. 1. Bump up the version to 1.4.1 2. Update the release notes, including an explanation of why 1.4.0 was pulled. 3. Patrick and I need info on how to upload to Sourceforge. David or Jarrod, can you te

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Superpack - one Complex test failure

2010-03-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:06 PM, wrote: > This test has been reported to fail for a while on Windows. It also > fails with numpy 1.4.0 > > Thanks Josef. In that case I'm good to go. Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Superpack - one Complex test failure

2010-03-01 Thread josef . pktd
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Finally I got my Wine environment sorted out - I'm now able to build > superpack installers for both Python 2.5 and 2.6. I tested the 2.6 installer > on Windows XP, and got a single test failure. This exact same test also is > the only test fai

[Numpy-discussion] Superpack - one Complex test failure

2010-03-01 Thread Ralf Gommers
Finally I got my Wine environment sorted out - I'm now able to build superpack installers for both Python 2.5 and 2.6. I tested the 2.6 installer on Windows XP, and got a single test failure. This exact same test also is the only test failure with the numpy 1.3 installer on sourceforge. So the inst

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Iterative Matrix Multiplication

2010-03-01 Thread Friedrich Romstedt
2010/3/1 Charles R Harris : > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Ian Mallett wrote: >> Excellent--and a 3D rotation matrix is 3x3--so the list can remain n*3. >> Now the question is how to apply a rotation matrix to the array of vec3? > > It looks like you want something like > > res = dot(vec, rot)