Re: [Numpy-discussion] tracking additions to NumPy across versions

2009-12-16 Thread David Warde-Farley
On 16-Dec-09, at 5:21 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there currently anything in the docstring standard about tracking > when functions get added to NumPy? The recent discussion of > matrix_rank got me thinking about this. Once again, Google answered for me a few minutes after I

[Numpy-discussion] tracking additions to NumPy across versions

2009-12-16 Thread David Warde-Farley
Hi all, Is there currently anything in the docstring standard about tracking when functions get added to NumPy? The recent discussion of matrix_rank got me thinking about this. Regards, David ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Matthew Brett wrote: >> I'm happy to write the doctests as tests.   My feeling is there is no >> objection to this function at the moment, so it would be reasonable, >> unless I hear otherwise,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:13:08PM -0500, Matthew Brett wrote: > I'm happy to write the doctests as tests. My feeling is there is no > objection to this function at the moment, so it would be reasonable, > unless I hear otherwise, to commit to SVN. I have one small comment: I am really happy to

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > >>> Is it reasonable to summarize that, to avoid confusion, we keep >>> 'matrix_rank' as the name? >>> >>> I've edited as Robert suggested, attempting to adopt a more suitable >>> tone in the docstring... > >> What comes next when someo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, >> Is it reasonable to summarize that, to avoid confusion, we keep >> 'matrix_rank' as the name? >> >> I've edited as Robert suggested, attempting to adopt a more suitable >> tone in the docstring... > What comes next when someone offers up a useful function like this? > We are using an earli

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Proposal for matrix_rank function in numpy

2009-12-16 Thread Skipper Seabold
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > Is it reasonable to summarize that, to avoid confusion, we keep > 'matrix_rank' as the name? > > I've edited as Robert suggested, attempting to adopt a more suitable > tone in the docstring... > > Thanks a lot, > > Matthew > > What c

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slicing slower than matrix multiplication?

2009-12-16 Thread denis
A general question, is there a collection of numpy code snippets as transformed by experts, short of google site:mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion or the like ? And a subquestion, does anyone have a list of algebraic identities for .T vstack etc ? for a real example, to transform do

[Numpy-discussion] fsum

2009-12-16 Thread Alan G Isaac
Does NumPy have an equivalent to Python's math.fsum? Thanks, Alan Isaac ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Failure building scipy.special.lambertw

2009-12-16 Thread Pauli Virtanen
t; http://img.skitch.com/20091216-d4b8ueqh27g4fqwebu3e3wgfkq.jpg npy_cabs et al. are defined in npy_math.h, and it seems you have an old version of that lying somewhere. Do you have an old version of Numpy installed at /Library/Python/2.6/site-packages/numpy _