I think that I finally figured it out. See code below.
Phillip
*** Start of myarray.py ***
import numpy
def array(*args, **kwargs):
"""This function acts as an interface to numpy.array, accepting
multi-row matrices with or without an outer set of enclosing brackets.
Usage examples:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Tony Yu wrote:
> Sorry, I don't know if its proper mailing-list-etiquette to bump my
> own post...
I don't see a problem as long as you wait at least a few days before
bumping (which you did).
>
>
> Are there any comments on whether this interp error is expec
On 16-Jul-09, at 9:34 PM, Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
> This does the right thing sometimes, but not always. Out[2] and
> Out[4]
> are fine, but Out[3] is not (note the extra set of braces). Probably
> the only right way to fix this is to modify numpy itself.
yes, to achieve out[3] you'd need
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 20:34, Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
> This does the right thing sometimes, but not always. Out[2] and Out[4]
> are fine, but Out[3] is not (note the extra set of braces). Probably
> the only right way to fix this is to modify numpy itself.
Modifying numpy.array() would have
This does the right thing sometimes, but not always. Out[2] and Out[4]
are fine, but Out[3] is not (note the extra set of braces). Probably
the only right way to fix this is to modify numpy itself.
Phillip
In [1]: def myarray(*args, **kwargs): return np.array([z for z in args],
**kwargs) .
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 06:13:22PM -0700, Ariel Rokem wrote:
>a first for me - upgrading ETS worked - hurray!
Dave, _thank you_ for doing the work of releasing and building binaries.
Ga�l
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
Hi -
a first for me - upgrading ETS worked - hurray!
Just a couple of comments - running:
arokem$ easy_install -U "ETS[nonets] == 3.3.0"
resulted in the following error:
"pkg_resources.UnknownExtra: CodeTools 3.0.0 has no such extra feature
'nonets'"
Then, I ran it, calling instead
arokem$ easy_i
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> If someone has a camera that can do the recordings in a format that
> can then be directly recompressed at the command line with something
> like mencoder, that would be great. From experience, any recording
> mode that requires later man
Hi all,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
> I really hope someone will take the initiative. This, for me, is the most
> interesting of programming conferences; including outside the python
> community.
> I can't imagine this to be that technically challenging.. I would think.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:27:03PM -0400, Ian Stokes-Rees wrote:
> But keep in mind there are costs to running the event, and an associated
> registration fee. It seems only fair that any webcasting or recording
> only be made available at some cost to the viewers. I would be happy to
> pay t
On 16-Jul-09, at 11:05 AM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:29:27PM -0400, Peter Alexander wrote:
>> I sure wish I was able to attend this year's event.
>> I'm wondering, and really hoping, if/that the lectures will be
>> recorded
>> and then posted for the whole communit
I noticed a few days ago that the cross-reference to 'nonzero' on this:
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.where.html
points to the C API rather than the Python API. I had a quick gander
at the Sphinx docs but didn't see anything about how to remedy this.
Anyone?
Regar
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:49 PM, David Warde-Farley wrote:
> On 16-Jul-09, at 3:09 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
>
>> def myarray(*args, **kwargs):
>> return np.array([z for z in args], **kwargs)
>
>
> This version is better IMHO, because then you can still specify the
> dtype by keyword. although (j
On 16-Jul-09, at 3:09 PM, Keith Goodman wrote:
> def myarray(*args, **kwargs):
>return np.array([z for z in args], **kwargs)
This version is better IMHO, because then you can still specify the
dtype by keyword. although (just to be a pedant)
> return np.array(args, **kwargs)
works as wel
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce that Enthought Tool Suite (ETS) version 3.3.0
has been tagged and released! Please see below for a partial list of
changes for this release.
PyPi has been updated with the release, including the availability of
both Windows binaries (.egg) and source distributio
On 2009-07-16, David Cournapeau wrote:
> Hi Pauli,
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When you add new functions to Numpy, please include
>>
>> .. versionadded:: 1.4.0
>
> What is the best way to do this in the reference guide directly as
> well (for C API).
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Phillip M.
Feldman wrote:
> numpy.array understands
>
> V= array([[1,2,3,4],[4,3,2,1]])
>
> but not
>
> V= array([1,2,3,4],[4,3,2,1])
>
> It would be more convenient if it could handle either form.
You could do something like this:
def myarray(*args):
return
On 16-Jul-09, at 2:43 PM, Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
> numpy.array understands
>
> V= array([[1,2,3,4],[4,3,2,1]])
>
> but not
>
> V= array([1,2,3,4],[4,3,2,1])
>
> It would be more convenient if it could handle either form.
That may be so, but the second argument is dtype. This would break that.
numpy.array understands
V= array([[1,2,3,4],[4,3,2,1]])
but not
V= array([1,2,3,4],[4,3,2,1])
It would be more convenient if it could handle either form.
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listi
I think for PyCon, a lot of the seminars are online for free (even for non
attendees). Also, when I've run a workshop, I just asked the speakers to
sign a release form to authorize distribution of videos, etc. This would be
best to be agreed upon in advance. Personally, for me, conferences are m
> The open source community is all about volunteering and with that
> being said, I wouldn't expect the conference organizers to necessarily
> be involved in the cooridination of such an initiative.
>
> I almost feel its a duty of someone to pick up the ball and run with it.
But keep in mind th
Sorry, I don't know if its proper mailing-list-etiquette to bump my
own post...
Are there any comments on whether this interp error is expected
behavior?
Thanks,
-Tony
> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:50:50 -0400
> From: Tony Yu
> Subject: [Numpy-discussion] Using interpolate with zero-rank arra
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Gökhan SEVER wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I sure wish I was able to attend this year's event.
>> I'm wondering, and really hoping, if/that the lectures will be recorded
>> and then posted for the whole co
2009/7/15 David Warde-Farley :
> Here's an interesting problem, and it might've already been solved by
> some of you folks that do image processing:
>
> Suppose I have an 8-bit integer 2-d array, X, and I want a 256x256
> matrix that tells me how many times a pixel value v was horizontally
> (along
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I sure wish I was able to attend this year's event.
> I'm wondering, and really hoping, if/that the lectures will be recorded and
> then posted for the whole community's benefit?
>
> thanks,
> ~Peter
>
> ___
I too am interested in this option, but for understandable reasons the
conference committee aren't able to organize this extra work. I had
approached them about it a month ago, but was told some committed
volunteer would need to take this on.
Since there aren't parallel sessions, a "low-tech"
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:29:27PM -0400, Peter Alexander wrote:
>I sure wish I was able to attend this year's event.
>I'm wondering, and really hoping, if/that the lectures will be recorded
>and then posted for the whole community's benefit?
The problem is that this requires actually
Hi Pauli,
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When you add new functions to Numpy, please include
>
> .. versionadded:: 1.4.0
What is the best way to do this in the reference guide directly as
well (for C API). For example, I added the function npy_copysign for
1.4.
28 matches
Mail list logo
