Re: [Numpy-discussion] npfile deprecation warning

Robert Kern wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 18:48, Brennan > Williams wrote: > >> Robert Kern wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 17:27, Brennan >>> Williams wrote: >>> >>> Hi I'm using npfile which is giving me a deprecation warning. For the time being I want

Re: [Numpy-discussion] npfile deprecation warning

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 18:48, Brennan Williams wrote: > Robert Kern wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 17:27, Brennan >> Williams wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I'm using npfile which is giving me a deprecation warning. For the time >>> being I want to continue using it but I would like to suppress >>> t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] npfile deprecation warning

Robert Kern wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 17:27, Brennan > Williams wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm using npfile which is giving me a deprecation warning. For the time >> being I want to continue using it but I would like to suppress >> the warning messages. Is it possible to trap the deprecation wa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] npfile deprecation warning

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 17:27, Brennan Williams wrote: > Hi > > I'm using npfile which is giving me a deprecation warning. For the time > being I want to continue using it but I would like to suppress > the warning messages. Is it possible to trap the deprecation warning but > still have the npfile

[Numpy-discussion] npfile deprecation warning

Hi I'm using npfile which is giving me a deprecation warning. For the time being I want to continue using it but I would like to suppress the warning messages. Is it possible to trap the deprecation warning but still have the npfile go ahead? Thanks Brennan __

[Numpy-discussion] Join us for the 2nd Scientific Computing with Python Webinar

Hello all Python users: I am pleased to announce the second installment of a free Webinar series that discusses using Python for scientific computing. Enthought hosts this free series which takes place once a month for about 60-90 minutes. The schedule and length may change based on

Re: [Numpy-discussion] passing arrays between processes

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Bryan Cole wrote: >>  In fact, I should have specified previously: I need to >> deploy on MS-Win. On first glance, I can't see that mpi4py is >> installable on Windows. > > My mistake. I see it's included in Enthon, which I'm using. > Hi, Bryan... I'm the author of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ready for review: PyArrayNeighIterObject, an iterator to iterate over a neighborhood in arbitrary arrays

Thanks, Pauli! DG --- On Mon, 6/15/09, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > From: Pauli Virtanen > Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ready for review: PyArrayNeighIterObject, an > iterator to iterate over a neighborhood in arbitrary arrays > To: numpy-discussion@scipy.org > Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 1:3

Re: [Numpy-discussion] More on doc-ing new functions

Thanks, Pauli. Obvious follow-up: --- On Mon, 6/15/09, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > David Goldsmith kirjoitti: > > > Are new functions automatically added to the Numpy Doc > Wiki?  In > > particular: 0) is the documentation itself (assuming > there is some) > > added in such a way that it can be e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] passing arrays between processes

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:22, Bryan Cole wrote: > On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 15:50 -0500, Robert Kern wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 14:31, Bryan Cole wrote: >> > I'm starting work on an application involving cpu-intensive data >> > processing using a quad-core PC. I've not worked with multi-core sy

[Numpy-discussion] Scipy 0.6.0 to 0.7.0, sparse matrix change

I'm trying to track down a numerical discrepancy in our proejct. We noticed that a certain set of results are different having upgraded from scipy 0.6.0 to 0.7.0. The following item from the Scipy change-log is our current number-one suspect. Could anybody who knows suggest what was actually invo

Re: [Numpy-discussion] improving arraysetops

Neil Crighton wrote: > Robert Cimrman ntc.zcu.cz> writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I am starting a new thread, so that it reaches the interested people. >> Let us discuss improvements to arraysetops (array set operations) at [1] >> (allowing non-unique arrays as function arguments, better naming >> conve

[Numpy-discussion] Interleaved Arrays and

Hi, So I'm trying to get a certain sort of 3D terrain working in PyOpenGL. The idea is to get vertex buffer objects to draw a simple 2D plane comprised of many flat polygons, and use a vertex shader to deform that with a heightmap and map that on a sphere. I've managed to do this with a grid (si

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ready for review: PyArrayNeighIterObject, an iterator to iterate over a neighborhood in arbitrary arrays

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:00:53 -0600, Charles R Harris kirjoitti: > > 3) Documentation is needed. In particular, I think it worth mentioning > that the number of bounds is taken from the PyArrayIterObject, which > isn't the most transparent thing. For reference, the docs should probably go here: http:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] More on doc-ing new functions

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:58:42 -0700, David Goldsmith kirjoitti: > Are new functions automatically added to the Numpy Doc Wiki? In > particular: 0) is the documentation itself (assuming there is some) > added in such a way that it can be edited by Wiki users; Yes, new functions appear in the wiki, bu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Tutorial topics for SciPy'09 Conference

Hi all, In order to proceed with contacting speakers, we'd now like to get some feedback from you. This Doodle poll should take no more than a couple of minutes to fill out (no password or registration required): http://doodle.com/hb5bea6fivm3b5bk So please let us know which topics you are most