On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> In bzr (and as far as I see, also in hg), this kind of history
> rewriting is near impossible, so the best you can do is make a merge
> commit and leave all that history in there, visible in the 'second
> level' log (indented in the text vi
Hello,
When I work with arrays, I would like to print trailing zeros also.
Somehow, Numpy refuses to print trailing zeros of a number within an array.
For example, if I set the print precision to 5 decimal digits
(set_printoptions(5)) and try to print array([0.1001], it gives me 0.1
instead o
2009/4/11 Stéfan van der Walt :
> From my POV, the current system is very unproductive and, while
> git-svn makes life a bit easier, it comes with its own set of
> headaches. Especially now that we are evaluating different
> work-flows, we need the right kind of vcs to back it up.
Please take th
Hi Adam
2009/4/11 Adam Oliner :
> I see, thanks. Then the documentation should say that it returns an
> array of the _smallest_ indices of the minimum values along the given
> axis.
Please sign up on http://docs.scipy.org, then I'll give you acess to
the documentation editor.
Regards
Stéfan
Hi Neal
2009/4/11 Neal Becker :
> I found this misleading. It isn't just used to _fill_ the array - it is the
Please create an account on docs.scipy.org, then I'll give you
priviledges to edit documentation.
Thanks!
Stéfan
___
Numpy-discussion mailing
2009/4/12 Charles R Harris :
> I vote that we don't even think about a decision until next year. The
> current system works well enough, I think. Meanwhile, the endless
> discussions are fun and pass the time.
I'll take that with a pinch of salt, as I assume it was intended :)
>From my POV, the c
2009/4/11 Stéfan van der Walt
> Hi all,
>
> DVCS discussions are notoriously unproductive, aren't they :)
>
> The two systems under discussion, git and hg, are both *almost* what
> we want, which means we have to make a choice and compromise.
>
>
> Here are some of the pros and cons I've picked u
Hi all,
DVCS discussions are notoriously unproductive, aren't they :)
The two systems under discussion, git and hg, are both *almost* what
we want, which means we have to make a choice and compromise.
Here are some of the pros and cons I've picked up, and I'm sure you
can add more:
Git has wel
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>
> Why not try asking on mercur...@selenic.com (gmane.comp.version-
> control.mercurial.general)
Done:
http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2009-April/025131.html
O.
___
Numpy-discussion maili
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Eric Firing
>>> wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:45 PM, David Cournapeau
> wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:45 PM, David Cournapeau
wrote:
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> It is maybe easier to learn how to w
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:45 PM, David Cournapeau
>>> wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> It is maybe easier to learn how to work with different clones, but
> once you start working wit
b = a2.copy()
base256 = 256**arange(4)
idx = dot(a2, base256)
from = dot((255,0,0,255), base256)
to = dot((0,0,0,255), base256)
b[idx == from] = to
Nadav
-הודעה מקורית-
מאת: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org בשם Frank Peacock
נשלח: ש 11-אפריל-09 02:28
אל: numpy-discussion@scipy.org
נושא:
Hi,
> Sturla Molden has a patch adding offset support to memmap. However... the
> feature requires Python 2.5 and above. The Python version is checked for in
> the code but I am wondering if we want to do that sort of thing. Using
> advanced features here and there doesn't bother me too much as lo
Hi All,
Sturla Molden has a patch adding offset support to memmap. However... the
feature requires Python 2.5 and above. The Python version is checked for in
the code but I am wondering if we want to do that sort of thing. Using
advanced features here and there doesn't bother me too much as long a
numpy.ndarray says:
buffer : object exposing buffer interface, optional
Used to fill the array with data.
I found this misleading. It isn't just used to _fill_ the array - it is the
actual storage for the array. If set to an object exporting the buffer
interface, any updates to the ndarray wi
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Bruce Southey wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:38 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gael Varoquaux
>> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:05:55PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Eric Firing
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:38 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gael Varoquaux
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:05:55PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> No need to apologize, I think I used the work bash
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 07:38:42PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
> But that's a development tool. I think it is expected that people have
> to somewhat learn something about it. I agree we should care about
> barrier of entry - if there is no way to make Josef happy, for
> example, that would be a
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:38 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gael Varoquaux
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:05:55PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> No need to apologize, I think I used the work bash
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Gael Varoquaux
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:05:55PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> No need to apologize, I think I used the work bashing inappropriately
>> - I just wanted to say that the only way t
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:54:59PM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
>It seems that designing an intuitive gui that fits a dvcs isn't all that
>easy, and git is a bit of a jump because of the way it treats branches and
>the irrelevence of time as opposed to change set sequence. I think the
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:05:55PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> No need to apologize, I think I used the work bashing inappropriately
> - I just wanted to say that the only way to understand the differences
> between the tools is to use th
23 matches
Mail list logo
