On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Sul, Young L wrote:
> I'll have to get back to you on the files.
>
> Would you like a login to a solaris 10 system? I could provide that.
That could be useful, yes. I had a solaris 10 install, but I am afraid
I had to wipe it out at some point, and I don't rememb
I'll have to get back to you on the files.
Would you like a login to a solaris 10 system? I could provide that.
From: numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org [numpy-discussion-boun...@scipy.org]
On Behalf Of David Cournapeau [courn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, M
2009/3/20 Grissiom :
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:03, wrote:
>>
>> for testing purposes it is available in numpy testing:
>> from numpy.testing import assert_equal, assert_almost_equal,
>> assert_array_equal
>> >>> a = np.array([ 1., 2., np.NaN, 4.])
>> >>> assert_array_equal(a,a)
>>
>> doe
Hi,
2009/3/21 Sul, Young L :
> Hi,
>
> (I’m on a Solaris 10 intel system, and am trying to use the sunperf
> libraries)
> An immediate problem is that some files seem to have embedded ^Ms in them. I
> had to clean and rerun a few times before numpy installed.
Could you tell me what those files ar
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:03, wrote:
> for testing purposes it is available in numpy testing:
> from numpy.testing import assert_equal, assert_almost_equal,
> assert_array_equal
> >>> a = np.array([ 1., 2., np.NaN, 4.])
> >>> assert_array_equal(a,a)
>
> does not raise AssertionError
>
> >
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Pierre GM wrote:
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> Grissiom wrote:
>>> I know I should use array_equal to test two arrays
>>
>> Not answering your question, but I hadn't known about array_equal, so
>> when I saw this, I thought: great!
On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:39 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Grissiom wrote:
>> I know I should use array_equal to test two arrays
>
> Not answering your question, but I hadn't known about array_equal, so
> when I saw this, I thought: great! I can get rid of a bunch of ugly
> code
> in my tests. Ho
Grissiom wrote:
> I know I should use array_equal to test two arrays
Not answering your question, but I hadn't known about array_equal, so
when I saw this, I thought: great! I can get rid of a bunch of ugly code
in my tests. However, it doesn't work as I would like for NaNs:
>>> a
array([ 1.,
Hi,
(I'm on a Solaris 10 intel system, and am trying to use the sunperf libraries)
I downloaded the 0.9.4 branch of numpy.scons.support, and tried to install from
that.
An immediate problem is that some files seem to have embedded ^Ms in them. I
had to clean and rerun a few times before numpy i
David Cournapeau said the following on 3/20/2009 6:03 AM:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:50 AM, David E. Sallis
>> wrote:
>>> David Cournapeau said the following on 3/18/2009 9:43 PM:
I am pleased to announce the release of the first
Hi,
I went to https://launchpad.net/numpy.scons.support/+download and grabbed
numscons-0.9.2.tar.bz2.
But, you get this error when installing numpy:
RuntimeError: You need numscons >= 0.9.3 to build numpy with numscons (detected
0.9.2 )
So I did the easy install upgrade (easy_install -U numsc
Hi!
In
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numscons-0.9.4-py2.4.egg/numscons
There is this:
r...@nightingale # ls -F
__init__.py*core/ numdist/tools/
__init__.pycmisc.py*testcode_snippets.py*
version.py*
checkers/
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:03 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:50 AM, David E. Sallis
>> wrote:
>>> David Cournapeau said the following on 3/18/2009 9:43 PM:
I am pleased to announce the release of the first
Dear All,
we are proceeding with the building of our data analysis software and
also not raise licensing problem we are splitting the “core” part and the GUI
part. We will try open a scikit for scipy for chemometrics and we are trying to
port all the essential routines that already exist.
One qu
Hi all,
When I try to use assertEqual in unittest to test my numpy codes I got this:
==
ERROR: test_test (__main__.Test_data_ana)
--
Traceback (most recent call
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM, David Cournapeau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:50 AM, David E. Sallis
> wrote:
>> David Cournapeau said the following on 3/18/2009 9:43 PM:
>>> I am pleased to announce the release of the first beta for numpy 1.3.0.
>>
>> I would totally love to begin using
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:50 AM, David E. Sallis wrote:
> David Cournapeau said the following on 3/18/2009 9:43 PM:
>> I am pleased to announce the release of the first beta for numpy 1.3.0.
>
> I would totally love to begin using this. Can I trouble you to include MD5
> (or PGP, or SHA) signatu
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:09:49 +0100
Vincent Thierion wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there an "easy way" to build numpy on remote 64 bits
>machines on which I
> don't have any roots privilege ?
python setup.py install --prefix=$HOME/local
Nils
___
Nump
Hello,
Is there an "easy way" to build numpy on remote 64 bits machines on which I
don't have any roots privilege ?
The shared problem seems related to 64 bits / 32 bits building.
Vincent
2009/3/20 David Cournapeau
> 2009/3/20 Vincent Thierion :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I built the numpy module for
19 matches
Mail list logo
