Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot not building?

2009-03-17 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:25:37 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > 2009/2/14 Pauli Virtanen : >> It seems that the buildbot.scipy.org is not picking up the changes in >> Numpy trunk. >> >> I'd guess this could be some issue with SVNPoller. At least it doesn't >> preserve states across buildmaster restar

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Slicing/selection in multiple dimensions simultaneously

2009-03-17 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:26:38 -0600, Robert Kern wrote: > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 03:11, Stéfan van der Walt > wrote: [clip: ix_(...,:,...)] > No, you're right. It doesn't work. The only way to make it work seems to be to define a special shaped slice object that indexing understands... I wonder if t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot not building?

2009-03-17 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:25:37 +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > Pauli, > > 2009/2/14 Pauli Virtanen : >> It seems that the buildbot.scipy.org is not picking up the changes in >> Numpy trunk. >> >> I'd guess this could be some issue with SVNPoller. At least it doesn't >> preserve states across build

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Enhancements for NumPy's FFTs

2009-03-17 Thread Christopher Barker
David Cournapeau wrote: > You can use the command line version: svn diff gives exactly what you need. http://www.sliksvn.com/en/download is a good source of the command line client for Windows. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Buildbot not building?

2009-03-17 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
Pauli, 2009/2/14 Pauli Virtanen : > It seems that the buildbot.scipy.org is not picking up the changes in > Numpy trunk. > > I'd guess this could be some issue with SVNPoller. At least it doesn't > preserve states across buildmaster restarts, so replacing it with the > following might help: The f

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Enhancements for NumPy's FFTs

2009-03-17 Thread David Cournapeau
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Sturla Molden wrote: > >> Well, that's nearly as good. (Though submitting a single svn diff >> containing all changes could have been a bit more easy to handle than >> separate patches for each file. But a small nitpick only.) > > The problem is I am really bad at