On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> 2009/3/16 Peter Saffrey :
>
>> At the moment, I'm using a fairly naive approach that finds roughly in the
>> genome (which gene) each point might be and then checking it against the
>> bins in that gene. If I split the problem into chromosomes,
2009/3/16 Peter Saffrey :
> At the moment, I'm using a fairly naive approach that finds roughly in the
> genome (which gene) each point might be and then checking it against the
> bins in that gene. If I split the problem into chromosomes, I feel sure
> there must be some super-fast matrix approac
I'm trying to file a set of data points, defined by genome coordinates, into
bins, also based on genome coordinates. Each data point is (chromosome, start,
end, point) and each bin is (chromosome, start, end). I have about 140 million
points to file into around 100,000 bins. Both are (roughly)
Hi,
I have just started the 1.3.x branch - as such, any change done to the
trunk will not end up in the 1.3 release. I will announce the 1.3 beta
release within the day, hopefully,
cheers,
David
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.
2009/3/16 Ryan May
> Hi,
>
> What's the status on SVN and ticket email notifications? The only messages
> I'm seeing since the switch is the occasional spam. Should I try
> re-subscribing?
>
I get the ticket notifications but I think the svn notifications are still
broken. I needed to update m
On Mon, March 16, 2009 4:05 pm, Sturla Molden wrote:
> On 3/16/2009 9:27 AM, Pearu Peterson wrote:
>
>> If a operation produces new array then the new array should have the
>> storage properties of the lhs operand.
>
> That would not be enough, as 1+a would behave differently from a+1. The
> former
Hi,
What's the status on SVN and ticket email notifications? The only messages
I'm seeing since the switch is the occasional spam. Should I try
re-subscribing?
Ryan
--
Ryan May
Graduate Research Assistant
School of Meteorology
University of Oklahoma
Sent from: Norman Oklahoma United States.
_
On 3/16/2009 9:27 AM, Pearu Peterson wrote:
> If a operation produces new array then the new array should have the
> storage properties of the lhs operand.
That would not be enough, as 1+a would behave differently from a+1. The
former would change storage order and the latter would not.
Broadca
On Sun, March 15, 2009 8:57 pm, Sturla Molden wrote:
>
> Regarding ticket #1054. What is the reason for this strange behaviour?
>
a = np.zeros((10,10),order='F')
a.flags
> C_CONTIGUOUS : False
> F_CONTIGUOUS : True
> OWNDATA : True
> WRITEABLE : True
> ALIGNED : True
> UPDATEI
On 20-Feb-09, at 6:41 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> Alright, thanks for the reply.
>
> Is there a canonical way /sample code to gain low level access to
> blas / lapack
> atlas routines using ctypes from numpy / scipy code?
>
> I don't mind fixing the dimensions and the ndtype of my array if it
10 matches
Mail list logo
