Francesc Alted wrote:
> A Saturday 07 February 2009, Neil escrigué:
>
>> Travis E. Oliphant enthought.com> writes:
>>
>>> I've been fairly quiet on this list for awhile due to work and
>>> family schedule, but I think about how things can improve
>>> regularly.One feature that's been r
> I see. I think it's a bit confusing that one needs to build a new
> build system just to build numpy, e.g. that both distutils and scons
> are not good enough.
I would not say that numscons is a *new* build system. Rather, I look
at numscons as a glue layer that allows scons to be used within
d
On Feb 7, 2009, at 8:03 AM, Nils Wagner wrote:
>
> ==
> ERROR: Test flat on masked_matrices
> --
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/usr/local/lib6
Hi David,
> Sorry for the confusion: numscons is NOT the preferred build system.
> The current numpy.distutils extensions, as shipped by numpy, is the
> preferred one. Numscons is more an experiment, if you want.
Ah, I see, thanks for the clarification.
>> So is it supposed to be in Debian?
>
>
A Saturday 07 February 2009, Neil escrigué:
> Travis E. Oliphant enthought.com> writes:
> > I've been fairly quiet on this list for awhile due to work and
> > family schedule, but I think about how things can improve
> > regularly.One feature that's been requested by a few people is
> > the ab
Thanks. I tried the latest version and indeed there is no leak.
Cheers,
Suchindra
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 13:24, Suchindra Sandhu
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I accidently stumbled upon this odd behavior by numpy.any. The following
> > code leaks
Hi Ondrej,
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have couple beginners questions about numscons. What is the
> preferred build system for numpy now, is it numscons? The README
> doesn't mention numscons, so I am a bit confused what the future plan
> is.
>
Sorry for the
Travis E. Oliphant enthought.com> writes:
> I've been fairly quiet on this list for awhile due to work and family
> schedule, but I think about how things can improve regularly.One
> feature that's been requested by a few people is the ability to select
> multiple fields from a structured
==
ERROR: Test flat on masked_matrices
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/ma/tests/test_core.py",
lin
