Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Michael Colonno wrote: >This is the first failure in the build log: > > _configtest.c > _configtest.c(1): catastrophic error: could not open source file > "inttypes.h" > #include >^ > > compilation aborted for _configtest.c (code 4) >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread William Reade
Hi Tim Thank you for your interest! To answer your various questions order of approximately increasing complexity: Most importantly: the currently available version of Resolver One does not have numpy support built in, and for various reasons I wouldn't advise trying to integrate Ironclad w

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread Michael Colonno
This is the first failure in the build log: _configtest.c _configtest.c(1): catastrophic error: could not open source file "inttypes.h" #include ^ compilation aborted for _configtest.c (code 4) failure. I don't have this file anywhere on my system; it appears to b

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello William, once again. I just noticed that Resolver One can only import data from Excel. In science, the common low level data exchange format is ASCII text like: CSV or tab separated. You may consider adding this. I did not find any installation instructions contained in the docs for the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread Michael Colonno
OK, I'm on the cusp of success now. I updated to the most recent code and get to a sequence of errors surround math functions. This must be due to linking the MKL libs. I tried various combinations (including those recommended by the MKL docs) but could not get around the errors. Looks like a mi

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread Tim Michelsen
Hello William, > * A few performance improvements. > * Over 900 NumPy tests now pass: in fact, almost all the tests from the > core, fft, lib, linalg, ma, oldnumeric and random subpackages. I have some questions here for the science interested. I hope that they are not too specific: * Can you a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Michael Colonno wrote: >Not sure if it's a VS thing since I get different compile errors with > either the MS or Intel C compiler under the same environment (Visual Studio > for x64 console). Let me start with a more basic question: I'm using the > package avai

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread Michael Colonno
Not sure if it's a VS thing since I get different compile errors with either the MS or Intel C compiler under the same environment (Visual Studio for x64 console). Let me start with a more basic question: I'm using the package available on SourceForge (1.2.1, 2008-10-29 14:36). If it can be conf

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread Matthieu Brucher
> numpy\core\src\umathmodule.c.src(64): error: expected an identifier > static float frexpf(float x, int * i) >^ > > numpy\core\src\umathmodule.c.src(64): error: expected a ")" > static float frexpf(float x, int * i) >^ > > numpy\core\src\umathmodule.c.src(65): e

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread Michael Colonno
OK, I think I have a much better understanding of how this all gets assembled now. I've got the build environment using both Intel compilers (C++ and Fortran) and linked to the Intel MKL. Using the Intel C compiler (icl.exe, more "gcc-like") as a replacement cl.exe (it supports the same options,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] convolution axis

2009-01-29 Thread Gideon Simpson
The first option doesn't accept complex data. -gideon On Jan 29, 2009, at 1:18 AM, Nadav Horesh wrote: > There are at least two options: > 1. use convolve1d from numpy.numarray.nd_image (or scipy.ndimage) > 2. use scipy.signal.convolve and adjust the dimensions of the > convolution kenel to ali

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread David Cournapeau
Michael Colonno wrote: >OK, some progress here. I have two questions: 1) Let's forget about > the Intel compiler(s) for the moment and focus on a standard Windows > build. Python 2.6 comes with two classes in distutils: msvccompiler.py > and msvc9compiler.py. In reading through these, it appear

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Building on WinXP 64-bit, Intel Compilers

2009-01-29 Thread Michael Colonno
OK, some progress here. I have two questions: 1) Let's forget about the Intel compiler(s) for the moment and focus on a standard Windows build. Python 2.6 comes with two classes in distutils: msvccompiler.py and msvc9compiler.py. In reading through these, it appears msvc9compiler.py is ideally s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] A buildbot farm with shell access - for free ?

2009-01-29 Thread Christian Heimes
David Cournapeau wrote: > It is said in the email that this is reserved to the python project, and > prominent python projects like Twisted and Django. Would it be ok to try > to be qualified as a prominent python project as well ? Give it some time. Nobody - not even the Python core devs - have a

[Numpy-discussion] Ironclad 0.8 released

2009-01-29 Thread William Reade
Hi all I'm delighted to announce the release of Ironclad v0.8 -- the all-singing, all-dancing CPython API compatibility layer for IronPython -- available now from http://code.google.com/p/ironclad/ . Notable improvements over the last release include: * Ironclad is now a neatly self-contained

[Numpy-discussion] porting NumPy to Python 3

2009-01-29 Thread James Watson
Hi, I am interested in contributing to the port of NumPy to Python 3. Who I should coordinate effort with? I have started at the Python end of the problem (as opposed to http://www.scipy.org/Python3k), e.g. I have several patches to get 2to3 to work on NumPy's Python source code. James. ___

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Documentation: objects.inv ?

2009-01-29 Thread Scott Sinclair
> 2009/1/29 Pierre GM : > Pauli, how often is the documentation on docs.scipy.org updated from > SVN ? My understanding is the following: SVN -> doc-wiki - updated once daily at around 10:00 (UTC?). doc-wiki -> SVN - infrequently, when someone applies one or more doc patches produced from the doc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Documentation: objects.inv ?

2009-01-29 Thread Pierre GM
On Jan 29, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:28:46 -0500, Pierre GM wrote: >> Is there an objects.inv lying around for the numpy reference guide, >> or >> should I start one from scratch ? > > It's automatically generated by Sphinx, and can be found at > > http

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Documentation: objects.inv ?

2009-01-29 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:28:46 -0500, Pierre GM wrote: > Is there an objects.inv lying around for the numpy reference guide, or > should I start one from scratch ? It's automatically generated by Sphinx, and can be found at http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/objects.inv Let's make the promise th