Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:37 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:57 PM, David Cournapeau > > wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, David Cournapeau > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > I don't und

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:57 PM, David Cournapeau > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, David Cournapeau >> wrote: >> >> > >> > I don't understand why. The whole point of union in that case is to >> > make it clear that t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 6:57 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, David Cournapeau > wrote: > > > > > I don't understand why. The whole point of union in that case is to > > make it clear that type punning is ok, since by definition the two > > values start at the same

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > > I don't understand why. The whole point of union in that case is to > make it clear that type punning is ok, since by definition the two > values start at the same address. If this broke aliasing, any union > would. Here is what man gc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:38 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 2:20 AM, David Cournapeau > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:47 PM, David Cournapeau >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Charles R Harris < charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 2:20 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:47 PM, David Cournapeau >> > wrote: >>

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 2:20 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:47 PM, David Cournapeau > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Charles R Harris > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, De

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Request for review: dynamic_cpu_branch

2008-12-26 Thread David Cournapeau
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 10:47 PM, David Cournapeau > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:23 PM, David Cournapeau >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> David Cournapeau