Re: [Numpy-discussion] lfilter

2008-12-20 Thread Joris De Ridder
On 19 Dec 2008, at 17:10 , Sturla Molden wrote: > I am wondering if not scipy.signal.lfilter ought to be a part of the > core NumPy. Note that it is similar to the filter function found in > Matlab, and it makes a complement to numpy.convolve. > > May I suggest that it is renamed or aliased to nu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] new incremental statistics project

2008-12-20 Thread Charles R Harris
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:53 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Bradford Cross > wrote: > > This is a new project I just released. > > > > I know it is C#, but some of the design and idioms would be nice in > > numpy/scipy for working with discrete event simulators, time s

Re: [Numpy-discussion] missing doc dir in the official tarball

2008-12-20 Thread Pauli Virtanen
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:15:43 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Just to make it clear -- I think the docs should not be generated in >> the tarball -- only the sources should be there. > > I agree this makes more sense for you, as a packager, bu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] missing doc dir in the official tarball

2008-12-20 Thread David Cournapeau
Gael Varoquaux wrote: > > For Mayavi/ETS we put both. Docs are very important, and we feared people > having difficulties building them, as the doc build tools and build chain > isn't as mature as the rest of the build chain. > Yes, I don't think anyone is arguing for users to build the doc. Wh

Re: [Numpy-discussion] missing doc dir in the official tarball

2008-12-20 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 08:15:43PM +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: > For audiolab, I put the generated doc, thinking if people want to mess > with the doc, they are knowledgeable enough to deal with svn - but I > did not think about the packagers :) I am not sure what's the best > solution: maybe pu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] missing doc dir in the official tarball

2008-12-20 Thread David Cournapeau
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > Just to make it clear -- I think the docs should not be generated in > the tarball -- only the sources should be there. I agree this makes more sense for you, as a packager, but I am not sure it makes much sense to put the doc sources in

Re: [Numpy-discussion] missing doc dir in the official tarball

2008-12-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:35 AM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Stéfan van der Walt wrote: >> 2008/12/20 Ondrej Certik : >>> So we thought with Stefan that maybe a simpler solution is just to fix >>> the ./setup sdist (or how you create the tarball in numpy) to include