On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:42 PM, David Cournapeau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am strongly against dropping 2.4 support anytime soon. I haven't seen
> a strong rationale for using >= 2.5 features in numpy, supporting 2.4 is
> not so hard, and 2.4 is still the default python version on many OS (mac
Jarrod Millman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> * What versions of Python should be supported by what version of
>> numpy ? Are we to expect users to rely on Python2.5 for the upcoming
>> 1.3.x ? Could we have some kind of timeline on the trac s
On Dec 7, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Jarrod Millman wrote:
> NumPy 1.3.x should work with Python 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6. At some point
> we can drop 2.4, but I would like to wait a bit since we just dropped
> 2.3 support. The timeline is on the trac site:
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/numpy/milestone/1.3
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * What versions of Python should be supported by what version of
> numpy ? Are we to expect users to rely on Python2.5 for the upcoming
> 1.3.x ? Could we have some kind of timeline on the trac site or
> elsewhere (and if such
All,
* What versions of Python should be supported by what version of
numpy ? Are we to expect users to rely on Python2.5 for the upcoming
1.3.x ? Could we have some kind of timeline on the trac site or
elsewhere (and if such a timeline exists already, can I get the link?) ?
* Talking about
