Re: [Numpy-discussion] What happened to numpy-docs ?

On Nov 27, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Scott Sinclair wrote: > Looking at some recent changes made to docstrings in SVN by Pierre > (r6110 & r6111), these are not yet reflected in the doc wiki. > Well, I haven't committed my version yet. I'm polishing a couple of issues with functions that are not recog

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What happened to numpy-docs ?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 23:51, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 23:27, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> All, >>> I'd like to update routines.ma.rst on the numpy/numpy-docs/trunk S

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What happened to numpy-docs ?

2008/11/27 Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'd like to update routines.ma.rst on the numpy/numpy-docs/trunk SVN, > but the whole trunk seems to be MIA... Where has it gone ? How can I > (where should I) commit changes ? Hi Pierre, I've done a little bit of that at http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/do

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 2D phase unwrapping

My problem is how to calculate the power flow (free-space Poynting vector) given an image of a complex scalar electric-field image. This requires to calculate the *derivative* of the phase, and I think I found a way to do it directly bypassing phase unwrapping. 1. I may return to unwrapping if

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What happened to numpy-docs ?

On Nov 27, 2008, at 12:32 AM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 23:27, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All, >> I'd like to update routines.ma.rst on the numpy/numpy-docs/trunk SVN, >> but the whole trunk seems to be MIA... Where has it gone ? How can I >> (where should I) comm

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What happened to numpy-docs ?

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 23:27, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All, >> I'd like to update routines.ma.rst on the numpy/numpy-docs/trunk SVN, >> but the whole trunk seems to be MIA... Where has it gone ? How can I >> (

Re: [Numpy-discussion] What happened to numpy-docs ?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 23:27, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > I'd like to update routines.ma.rst on the numpy/numpy-docs/trunk SVN, > but the whole trunk seems to be MIA... Where has it gone ? How can I > (where should I) commit changes ? It got moved into the numpy trunk under doc

[Numpy-discussion] What happened to numpy-docs ?

All, I'd like to update routines.ma.rst on the numpy/numpy-docs/trunk SVN, but the whole trunk seems to be MIA... Where has it gone ? How can I (where should I) commit changes ? Thx in advance. P. ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@sc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Michael Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why? What do you think makes sunperf problematic? [Not that I want to do > the work, just curious :)] I *know* it will be difficult :) The problem of sunperf is that you cannot just link a few libraries to make it wor

[Numpy-discussion] unsubscirpt

___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

David Cournapeau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Peter Norton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Cournapeau >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Charles R Harris wrote: What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route? >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Peter Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Cournapeau > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Charles R Harris wrote: >> > >> > >> > What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route? >> >> Won't go far sinc

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 2D phase unwrapping

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Nadav Horesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I read a presentation by GERI (http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/GERI) that their code is > implemented in scipy, but I could not find it. One of my colleagues has been using 2D and 3D phase unwrapping code from Munther Gdeisat from

Re: [Numpy-discussion] numpy errors when importing in Picalo

igor Halperin wrote: > Hi, Hi > I get numpy errors after I install Picalo (www.picalo.org > ) on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger. I have tried to > import numpy in Picalo using the instructions in PicaloCookBook, p.101. > I get this error message which I don't understand. > Per P

[Numpy-discussion] numpy errors when importing in Picalo

Hi, I get numpy errors after I install Picalo (www.picalo.org) on Mac OS X 10.4.11 Tiger. I have tried to import numpy in Picalo using the instructions in PicaloCookBook, p.101. I get this error message which I don't understand. Per Picalo author (see below for his reply to my email to Picalo discu

Re: [Numpy-discussion] More loadtxt() changes

On Nov 26, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Ryan May wrote: > Manuel Metz wrote: >> Ryan May wrote: >>> 3) Better support for missing values. The docstring mentions a >>> way of >>> handling missing values by passing in a converter. The problem >>> with this is >>> that you have to pass in a converter for

Re: [Numpy-discussion] More loadtxt() changes

Manuel Metz wrote: > Ryan May wrote: >> 3) Better support for missing values. The docstring mentions a way of >> handling missing values by passing in a converter. The problem with this is >> that you have to pass in a converter for *every column* that will contain >> missing values. If you have

Re: [Numpy-discussion] More loadtxt() changes

John Hunter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Updated patch attached. This includes: >> * Updated docstring >> * New tests >> * Fixes for previous issues >> * Fixes to make new tests actually work >> >> I appreciate any and all feedback. > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 2D phase unwrapping

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 04:19, Fabrice Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mercredi 26 novembre 2008 à 09:17 +0200, Nadav Horesh a écrit : >> Is there a 2D phase unwrapping for python? >> I read a presentation by GERI (http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/GERI) that their code >> is implemented in scipy, but I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANNOUNCE: EPD with Py2.5 version 4.0.30002 RC2 available for testing

Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > Hello, Hi Travis, > It is currently available as a single-click installer for Windows XP > (x86), Mac OS X (a universal binary for OS X 10.4 and above), and > RedHat 3 and 4 (x86 and amd64). I am sure you mean RHEL 3 and 4? This "Redhat 3 and 4" always strikes me a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] ANNOUNCE: EPD with Py2.5 version 4.0.30002 RC2 available for testing

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:05:07PM -0600, Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > We've recently posted the beta1 build of EPD (the Enthought Python > Distribution) with Python 2.5 version 4.1.30001 to the EPD website. You > may download the beta from here: > http://www.enthought.com/products/epdearlyac

[Numpy-discussion] ANNOUNCE: EPD with Py2.5 version 4.0.30002 RC2 available for testing

Hello, We've recently posted the beta1 build of EPD (the Enthought Python Distribution) with Python 2.5 version 4.1.30001 to the EPD website. You may download the beta from here: http://www.enthought.com/products/epdearlyaccess.php You can check out the release notes here: https:

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Problems building numpy on solaris 10 x86

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:28 PM, David Cournapeau < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles R Harris wrote: > > > > > > What happens if you go the usual python setup.py {build,install} route? > > Won't go far since it does not handle sunperf. > > David Even though the regular build process appears

Re: [Numpy-discussion] More loadtxt() changes

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Updated patch attached. This includes: > * Updated docstring > * New tests > * Fixes for previous issues > * Fixes to make new tests actually work > > I appreciate any and all feedback. I'm having trouble applying your p

Re: [Numpy-discussion] More loadtxt() changes

Ryan May wrote: > Hi, > > I have a couple more changes to loadtxt() that I'd like to code up in time > for 1.3, but I thought I should run them by the list before doing too much > work. These are already implemented in some fashion in > matplotlib.mlab.csv2rec(), but the code bases are different

Re: [Numpy-discussion] 2D phase unwrapping

Le mercredi 26 novembre 2008 à 09:17 +0200, Nadav Horesh a écrit : > Is there a 2D phase unwrapping for python? > I read a presentation by GERI (http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/GERI) that their code is > implemented in scipy, but I could not find it. I had the same problem a couple of days ago! Playing wit