On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brent Pedersen wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:54, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any straightforward way of notifying on c
Brent Pedersen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:54, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is there any straightforward way of notifying on change of a numpy
>>> array that leaves the numpy arrays still efficient?
>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:17 PM, dmitrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for the ParallelProgramming wiki page, there are some words in
> section "Use parallel primitives" about numpy.dot still I can't
> understand from the section: if I get numpy from sources and compile it
> (via "python setup.py
Did you mean this one
http://www.netlib.org/scalapack/pblas_qref.html
?
As for the ParallelProgramming wiki page, there are some words in
section "Use parallel primitives" about numpy.dot still I can't
understand from the section: if I get numpy from sources and compile it
(via "python setup.py
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:54, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any straightforward way of notifying on change of a numpy
>> array that leaves the numpy arrays still efficient?
>
> Not currently, no.
>
> -
On Monday 27 October 2008 16:54:09 Erik Tollerud wrote:
> Is there any straightforward way of notifying on change of a numpy
> array that leaves the numpy arrays still efficient?
Erik, may be you could try the trick presented here :
http://www.scipy.org/Subclasses
in the __array_wrap__ section.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:54, Erik Tollerud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any straightforward way of notifying on change of a numpy
> array that leaves the numpy arrays still efficient?
Not currently, no.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harml
Hi,
Their exist open source version of parallel BLAS library. I modified
the section "Use parallel primitives" to tell it. But my English is
bad, so if someone can check it, it would be nice.
Fred
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1
Is there any straightforward way of notifying on change of a numpy
array that leaves the numpy arrays still efficient?
That is, I would like to do the following:
class C:
def __init__(self,arr):
self.arr = arr
#what code do put here?
def notify(self):
print 'do
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:20, Sebastien Binet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 27 October 2008 12:56:56 Robin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I made some changes to the ParallelProgramming wiki page to outline
>> use of the (multi)processing module as well as the threading module.
>>
>> I'm very much no
On Monday 27 October 2008 12:56:56 Robin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made some changes to the ParallelProgramming wiki page to outline
> use of the (multi)processing module as well as the threading module.
>
> I'm very much not an expert on this - just researched it for myself,
> so please feel free to corr
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:07, Mark Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to be able to create a poly1d instance with complex coefficients, and
> it works correctly. But I cannot integrate it. Does poly1d not support
> complex coefficients? Any reason why not, that shouldn't be too difficult,
I seem to be able to create a poly1d instance with complex coefficients, and
it works correctly. But I cannot integrate it. Does poly1d not support
complex coefficients? Any reason why not, that shouldn't be too difficult,
should it?
Thanks, Mark
>>> p = poly1d([1+1j,2+2j])
>>> p(2)
(4+4j)
>>> q=p
Hello list -
I can multiply a poly1d instance with a number, but when I multiply with a
number from an array, the order matters. That seems a bug:
>>> a = array([2])
>>> p = poly1d([1,2])
>>> print 2*p # Works
2 x + 4
>>> print a[0]*p # Doesn't work, returns an array
[2 4]
>>> print p*a[0] #
Hi,
I made some changes to the ParallelProgramming wiki page to outline
use of the (multi)processing module as well as the threading module.
I'm very much not an expert on this - just researched it for myself,
so please feel free to correct/ extend/ delete as appropriate.
Robin
_
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Philbin wrote:
>> One operator which could be used is '%'. We could keep the current
>> behaviour for ARRAY%SCALAR but have ARRAY%ARRAY as being matrix
>> multiplication. It has the same precedence as *,/.
>>
>
> No, h
James Philbin wrote:
> One operator which could be used is '%'. We could keep the current
> behaviour for ARRAY%SCALAR but have ARRAY%ARRAY as being matrix
> multiplication. It has the same precedence as *,/.
>
No, having completely unrelated meanings for the same operator symbol
sounds like a r
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:38, Nicolas ROUX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Me again ;-)
> I have now a new question to ask (I hope not too silly).
>
> How to do :
>
> for j in range(yHeight):
> for i in range(xWidth):
> x[j,i] = y[k,i] with k = numpy.mod(i+sj,yHeight)
>
> With efficien
We wrote a simple variation on the gradient() function to calculate the
second derivatives. Would there be any interest in including a
gradient2() in numpy?
Andrew
def gradient2(f, *varargs):
"""Calculate the second-order gradient of an N-dimensional scalar
function.
Uses central diffe
Hi,
Me again ;-)
I have now a new question to ask (I hope not too silly).
How to do :
for j in range(yHeight):
for i in range(xWidth):
x[j,i] = y[k,i] with k = numpy.mod(i+sj,yHeight)
With efficient numpy code, without the double "for" ?
Thanks,
Cheers,
Nicolas.
-Original Me
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Pierre Yger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> import bisect
> my_list.sort()
> time, ind = zip(*my_list)
> for i in id_list :
> beg = bisect.bisect_left(ind,i)
>end = bisect.bisect_right(ind,i)
>mylist.append(tim[beg:end])
>
I've always found itertools.gr
If what you are trying to do is actually ensure all data is within the
range [a,b], you may be interested to know that python's % operator
works on floating-point numbers:
In [1]: -0.1 % 1
Out[1]: 0.90002
So if you want all samples in the range (0,1) you can just do y%=1.
Anne
2008/
On 27-Oct-08, at 7:22 AM, James Philbin wrote:
> One operator which could be used is '%'. We could keep the current
> behaviour for ARRAY%SCALAR but have ARRAY%ARRAY as being matrix
> multiplication. It has the same precedence as *,/.
The problem is that it would monkey with existing semantics fo
Thanks for all of you,
for this fast and good reply ;-)
Nicolas.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Douard
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 12:51 PM
To: numpy-discussion@scipy.org
Subject: Re: [Numpy-discussion] How to do: y[y Hello,
>
>
Le Monday 27 October 2008 12:41:06 Nicolas ROUX, vous avez écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is not a silly question ;-)
> I have a Numpy array, and I want to process it with :
> "if the value is lower than Threshold, then increase by Threshold"
>
>
> I would like to translate it as:
> y[y
> To b
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:45:44PM +0100, Uwe Schmitt wrote:
> Nicolas ROUX schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I hope this is not a silly question ;-)
> > I have a Numpy array, and I want to process it with :
> > "if the value is lower than Threshold, then increase by Threshold"
> >
> >
> > I would like
Nicolas ROUX schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is not a silly question ;-)
> I have a Numpy array, and I want to process it with :
> "if the value is lower than Threshold, then increase by Threshold"
>
>
> I would like to translate it as:
> y[y
Hi,
your solution does not work, becaus the arr
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:41:06PM +0100, Nicolas ROUX wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is not a silly question ;-)
> I have a Numpy array, and I want to process it with :
> "if the value is lower than Threshold, then increase by Threshold"
>
>
> I would like to translate it as:
> y[y
You are
Hello,
I hope this is not a silly question ;-)
I have a Numpy array, and I want to process it with :
"if the value is lower than Threshold, then increase by Threshold"
I would like to translate it as:
y[yhttp://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
One operator which could be used is '%'. We could keep the current
behaviour for ARRAY%SCALAR but have ARRAY%ARRAY as being matrix
multiplication. It has the same precedence as *,/.
James
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http:
30 matches
Mail list logo
