[Numpy-discussion] Need **working** code example of 2-D arrays

2008-10-11 Thread Linda Seltzer
I received several pieces of advice concerning my previous question on the use of 2-D arrays. However, none of these pieces of advice resulted in code that works. The latest suggestion >> In numpy it's >>import numpy as npy >>a = npy.zeros((256,256)) produced this error message: > NameErr

Re: [Numpy-discussion] can't build numpy 1.2.0 under python 2.6 (windows-amd64) using VS9

2008-10-11 Thread Michael Abshoff
David Cournapeau wrote: > Michael Abshoff wrote: Hi David, >> Sure, but there isn't even a 32 bit gcc out there that can produce 64 >> bit PE binaries (aside from the MinGW fork that AFAIK does not work >> particularly well and allegedly has issues with the cleanliness of some >> of the code

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Installation of Numerical Python

2008-10-11 Thread Peter
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Linda Seltzer wrote: > > I did not give permission to have the e-mail sent to the list. > Please do not forawrd anyone's e-mail to a list without permission. I must apologise for my error - I had honestly assumed your email had been intended for the whole list. Th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Installation of Numerical Python

2008-10-11 Thread Alan G Isaac
On 10/11/2008 10:19 AM Linda Seltzer apparently wrote: > Please do not forawrd anyone's e-mail to a list without > permission. I'm afraid that is a reversal of discussion list practice. People on this list are not offering to participate in private conversations. They are offering to participa

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Installation of Numerical Python

2008-10-11 Thread Linda Seltzer
I did not give permission to have the e-mail sent to the list. Please do not forawrd anyone's e-mail to a list without permission. Also, kindly do not send an entire list a message falsely stating that someone may be using code written by someone else. I have been reading various tutorials on the I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] can't build numpy 1.2.0 under python 2.6 (windows-amd64) using VS9

2008-10-11 Thread David Cournapeau
Michael Abshoff wrote: > > Sure, but there isn't even a 32 bit gcc out there that can produce 64 > bit PE binaries (aside from the MinGW fork that AFAIK does not work > particularly well and allegedly has issues with the cleanliness of some > of the code which is allegedly the reason that the of

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Vectorizing "dot" on the two last axis

2008-10-11 Thread Gael Varoquaux
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 09:03:14AM -0400, Anne Archibald wrote: > I am pretty sure that, unfortunately, there is no way to vectorize > this without an intermediate array substantially larger than either > the inputs or the outputs. OK, this is what I had found. > From a computational point of vie

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Installation of Numerical Python

2008-10-11 Thread Peter
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Linda Seltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't know there was a difference between Numeric and numpy. Could > someone please provide clear, detailed instructions for how to get > *something* (numeric, numpy) to work so that I can get my work (matrices) > don