Can't browse source, etc.
Chuck
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 02:27:38 Charles R Harris wrote:
> Looks like you shouldn't use NumpyTestCase for the 1.2 test, however.
Looks like Alan updated it for me, the tests look OK on 1.2.
Interestingly, I segfault when running
python -c "import numpy; numpy.test()"
(NumPy version 1.2.0.dev5496)
FAIL: test_umath.TestC99.test_clog(, (-0.0, -0.0), (-inf,
-0.0), 'divide')
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 203, in runTest
self.test(*self.arg)
File "/usr/lib
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 02:06:35 Charles R Harris wrote:
> > But I thought Gentoo was for uber geeks? And testing the cpu cooler.
>
> Turns out that I'm not one. It's educational, though, but the older I get,
> the
> less com
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 02:06:35 Charles R Harris wrote:
> But I thought Gentoo was for uber geeks? And testing the cpu cooler.
Turns out that I'm not one. It's educational, though, but the older I get, the
less compiling kernels and tweaking OS corresponds to my idea of fun.
> Anyway, the tests
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Pierre, I suggest you go to python.org and install python-2.3.7 instead
> of
> > shooting blind. It's pretty easy if you're running linux, just be sure to
> > end with make altinstall in case your distro has python instal
> Pierre, I suggest you go to python.org and install python-2.3.7 instead of
> shooting blind. It's pretty easy if you're running linux, just be sure to
> end with make altinstall in case your distro has python installed in
> /usr/local.
I forgot to mention that my reluctance to install another P
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 01:10:30 Charles R Harris wrote:
> Hmm... 70 errors. Pretty much all of them of this sort:
> NameError: global name 'actual_dtype' is not defined
OK, that's a problem with numpy.ma.testutils. r5496 should fix that
>
> Pierre, I suggest you go to python.org and install pyt
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm in favor of putting it in. Pierre has also made some fixes to masked
> > arrays. I think that is about the end of it for 1.1.1. However, if
> anyone
> > is running Python 2.3 it would be helpful if you could test the r
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in favor of putting it in. Pierre has also made some fixes to masked
> arrays. I think that is about the end of it for 1.1.1. However, if anyone is
> running Python 2.3 it would be helpful if you could test the relea
2008/7/20 Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>arr
> array([('JOE', 25.301), ('BOB', 27.899)],
> dtype=[('stid', '|S4'), ('temp', '
loadtxt.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.or
> I'm in favor of putting it in. Pierre has also made some fixes to masked
> arrays. I think that is about the end of it for 1.1.1. However, if anyone
> is running Python 2.3 it would be helpful if you could test the release
> candidate as the buildbots are all 2.4 or 2.5.
Oh yes. I don't have ac
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Charles R Harris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The log file shows:
> >
> > File
> >
> "c:\numpy-buildbot\numpy\b11\install\Lib\site-packages\numpy\lib\tests\test_format.py",
> > li
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:02 PM, David Huard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan, I committed your patch to the trunk and added a test for it from your
> failing example.
>
> Jarrod, though I'm also wary to touch the branch so late, the patch is
> minor and I don't see how it could break something t
Thanks. I wouldn't have ordinarily pushed so much, but I wanted to hit
the bugfix release.
Ryan
David Huard wrote:
> Ryan, I committed your patch to the trunk and added a test for it from
> your failing example.
>
> Jarrod, though I'm also wary to touch the branch so late, the patch is
> min
Ryan, I committed your patch to the trunk and added a test for it from your
failing example.
Jarrod, though I'm also wary to touch the branch so late, the patch is minor
and I don't see how it could break something that was not already broken.
David
2008/7/20 Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jar
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Charles R Harris
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The log file shows:
>
> File
> "c:\numpy-buildbot\numpy\b11\install\Lib\site-packages\numpy\lib\tests\test_format.py",
> line 429, in test_memmap_roundtrip
> fp = open(nfn, 'wb')
>
> IOError: [Errno 2] No such fil
Looks good to me. I committed the patch to the trunk and added a regression
test (r5495).
David
2008/7/18 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was trying to use loadtxt() today to read in some text da
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/7/21 Suchindra Sandhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Is that the recommended way of checking the type of the array? Ususally
> for
> > type checkin, I use the isinstance built-in in python, but I see that
> will
> > n
2008/7/21 Suchindra Sandhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is that the recommended way of checking the type of the array? Ususally for
> type checkin, I use the isinstance built-in in python, but I see that will
> not work in this case. I must admit that I am a little confused by this. Why
> is type differe
Christopher Burns wrote:
> install numpy and they _do not_ have this version of python installed,
> Installer.app issues a warning:
> "numpy requires System Python 2.5 to install."
>
> The phrase "System Python" is misleading, it's reasonable to assume that
> refers to the system version of pyth
Charles,
Thx for the report, should be fixed in r5492/5493 (I've been overoptimistic
with r5490/5491)...
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hello,
I think i found a bug in numpy.ma
I tried it both with the trunk and the 1.1 version
import numpy
a= numpy.ma.arange(256)
a.shape=(128,2)
b=numpy.reshape(a,(64,2,2))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "quick_test_reshape.py", line 7, in
b=numpy.reshape(a,(64,2,2))
File
"
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A new copy of the reference guide is now available at
> http://mentat.za.net/numpy/refguide/
That looks great. A big thanks to everyone who is contributing to the
documentation.
--
Jarrod Millman
Computational Inf
Hi all,
A new copy of the reference guide is now available at
http://mentat.za.net/numpy/refguide/
and
http://mentat.za.net/numpy/refguide/NumPy.pdf
I'd like to thank Pauli Virtanen, who put in a lot of effort to
improve Sphinx interaction and document layout.
The guide is not yet complete, b
Hi Stéfan,
Is that the recommended way of checking the type of the array? Ususally for
type checkin, I use the isinstance built-in in python, but I see that will
not work in this case. I must admit that I am a little confused by this. Why
is type different from dtype?
Thanks,
Suchindra
On Fri,
26 matches
Mail list logo
