On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:48:21AM -0700, Andrew Straw wrote:
> Another option: the IPython people have been using launchpad.net (
> https://launchpad.net/ipython ) -- it supports bzr. I'm not sure how
> happy they are with it, but I think happy enough to stick with it rather
> than attempt to g
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pearu Peterson wrote:
> > Use Google Code. Pros: it provides necessary infrastructure to develop
> > software projects and I am used to it. Cons: in my experience Google
> > Code has been too many times broken (at least t
> Another option: the IPython people have been using launchpad.net (
> https://launchpad.net/ipython ) -- it supports bzr. I'm not sure how
> happy they are with it, but I think happy enough to stick with it rather
> than attempt to get a server with hg set up. IIRC, they did initially
> margi
Hey everyone,
The scipy.org site will be down intermittently today. We are trying to
upgrade its memory to improve performance.
Thank you,
-Travis O.
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman
I'm pretty new to Python and numpy (longtime c / matlab programmer),
but after a read through some of the past threads and Travis' "Guide
to Numpy", I think I have a fairly good understanding of how the
reshape() function / methods work, with regards to views and copies.
For what its worth (and to
On 11/04/2008, Andreas Klöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Freitag 11 April 2008, Robert Kern wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Charles R Harris
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Turns out it matches the matlab definition. Maybe we just need another
> > > function: vande
Pearu Peterson wrote:
> Use Google Code. Pros: it provides necessary infrastructure to develop
> software projects and I am used to it. Cons: in my experience Google
> Code has been too many times broken (at least three times in half a
> year), though this may improve in future. Also, Google Cod
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Keith Goodman wrote:
> Here's the formula:
Thanks, Keith. While I had read that page before I had not followed the
link to the FWMH page, and that provided the insight I needed. It's all
working now.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:05 AM, Rich Shepard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I see in the NumPy Book that there are functions to allow generation of
> beta, binomial, and poisson curves, but I don't see one for normal curves.
> Is there such a function?
>
>Currently I'm using code (I forget
I see in the NumPy Book that there are functions to allow generation of
beta, binomial, and poisson curves, but I don't see one for normal curves.
Is there such a function?
Currently I'm using code (I forget from where) that creates a Gaussian
distribution, but the tails do not reach zero (w
On Freitag 11 April 2008, Robert Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Charles R Harris
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Turns out it matches the matlab definition. Maybe we just need another
> > function: vandermonde
>
> -1 It's needless duplication.
Agree. Let's just live with Matlab
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. The formatting code, such as it is, is below.
It uses Martin Jansche's
double.py (http://symptotic.com/mj/double/double.py) and then does some
simple bit twiddling.
I'm still hoping someone can help me find a way to use this format for
arrays of float64s.
Ken
On Friday 11 April 2008 04:57:31 am Christopher Burns wrote:
> I think namespaces are one of the crown-jewels that make python more
> attractive to scientists (not programmers) over Matlab. Even if they don't
> realize it yet. :)
As a humble user who has neither the python-fu nor extension-fu to
Bill Baxter wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm not much help answering your questions. But one thing
> I've wondered about f2py is if it could be generalized into an f2***
> tool. How intertwined is the analysis of the fortran with the
> synthesis of the python? There are lots of languages that could
> be
I'm afraid I'm not much help answering your questions. But one thing
I've wondered about f2py is if it could be generalized into an f2***
tool. How intertwined is the analysis of the fortran with the
synthesis of the python? There are lots of languages that could
benefit from a fortran wrapper g
Hi,
I am in a process of writing a scientific paper about F2PY that will
provide an automatic solution to the Python and Fortran connection
problem. While writing it, I also need to decide what will be the future
of F2PY. In particulary, I have the following main questions to which I
am lookin
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Joe, all
>
> On 10/04/2008, Joe Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Absolutely. Let's please standardize on:
> > > import numpy as np
> > > import scipy as sp
> >
> > I hope we do NOT standardize on th
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Lou Pecora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I use np= number of points, too. But you all
> might want to use something else. That's the point of
> the flexibility of import ... as
I would recommend against using np as a variable name. Variable names
should
> > newul=ul/norm
>>the java doc mentions that by the above steps ul is normalised to unit
length (vector length)
> Umm, not quite, it is missing a square root. You can get the same result by
> using the Frobenius norm
thanks Chuck..
i found the norm as you advised and then found newul=ul/norm
On 10/04/2008, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you want the isreal function, but it will also return true for
> complex with 0 imaginary part. Hmm... the various iswhatever functions seem
> to be lacking in coverage. Maybe we should fix that.
icomplexobj is designed to solve
20 matches
Mail list logo
