On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. I'll work on random and report shortly.
As far as I can tell, there are no problems at all. I'm running
bic128[scipy]$ cython --version
Cython version 0.9.6.12
This is both on 64-bit Fedora 8 and 32-bit Ubuntu 7.10
Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Steven H. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, April 8, 2008 07:28, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> > ...
>>
>>
>> > http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/html/
>> > http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/ipython1.pdf
>> >
>> >
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is off-topic and should be directed to the pyrex/cython list, but
> since we're on the subject:
>
> I suppose the following is true, but let me ask, since I have not used
> Cython. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>
Howdy,
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Do you want me to obliterate the old numpy/doc/pyrex and replace it
> with numpy/doc/cython? That would make it clear what the tool to use
> is...
OK, the code is ready and I just updated the docs/makefile a
This is off-topic and should be directed to the pyrex/cython list, but
since we're on the subject:
I suppose the following is true, but let me ask, since I have not used
Cython. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I have a bunch of pyrex compiled .pyx code. If I start adding some
Cython compiled code
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Travis E. Oliphant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I say just add it. We should move forward with Cython. More important
> is to see if random actually builds with Cython right now. There was an
> issue that I recall from a few weeks ago that Cython could not bu
Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Gael Varoquaux
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Robert Kern wrote:
>> > I'm not sure how it could. It's example code, not part of numpy itself.
>>
>> OK, maybe I should keep my 2 cents. They appe
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:28:11PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote:
> > I *could* make it pyrex/cython-valid, it's trivial but just adds noise
> > IMHO... As Stefan said, pyrex is essentially unmaintained as far as
> > publ
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:28:11PM -0700, Fernando Perez wrote:
> I *could* make it pyrex/cython-valid, it's trivial but just adds noise
> IMHO... As Stefan said, pyrex is essentially unmaintained as far as
> publicly-visible development goes, while cython is very actively
> moving ahead and likel
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Robert Kern wrote:
> > I'm not sure how it could. It's example code, not part of numpy itself.
>
> OK, maybe I should keep my 2 cents. They appear to be forged money, and
> worth
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 04:20:28PM -0700, Robert Kern wrote:
> I'm not sure how it could. It's example code, not part of numpy itself.
OK, maybe I should keep my 2 cents. They appear to be forged money, and
worth nothing.
:-).
Gaël
___
Numpy-discussion
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:15:23AM +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> > I'm in favour of switching -- pyrex is as good as unmaintained, and in
> > contrast cython is improving by the day. Do the changes cause
> > probl
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:15:23AM +0200, Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> I'm in favour of switching -- pyrex is as good as unmaintained, and in
> contrast cython is improving by the day. Do the changes cause
> problems with pyrex, or can we even have both working at the same
> time? Either way, we
On 09/04/2008, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we want to just switch over to cython and use this instead? If
> people think that the cython switch is OK for 1.0.5 I can do it, but
> I'm not about to touch this before others approve...
I'm in favour of switching -- pyrex is as g
Hey,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried numpyx.pyx with cython-0.9.6.12.
>
> These were written for and still work with Pyrex. If it doesn't work
> with Cython then that is
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Steven H. Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, April 8, 2008 07:28, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > ...
>
> >
> > http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/html/
> > http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/ipython1.pdf
> >
> > Sphinx seems a very promising to the eve
On Tue, April 8, 2008 07:28, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> ...
>
> http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/html/
> http://ipython.scipy.org/doc/ipython1/ipython1.pdf
>
> Sphinx seems a very promising to the everlasting problem of documentation.
>
Thanks for bringing this up. I need to look at Sphinx.
Reg
2008/4/8, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
> I agree that the current histogram should be changed. However, I am not
> sure 1.0.5 is the correct release for that.
We both agree.
David, this doesn't work for your code:
> r= np.array([1,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,5])
> dbin=[2,3,4]
> rc,
Hi all,
several test failures are present in svn
File
"/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/tests/test_financial.py",
line 4, in test_financial
Failed example:
rate(10,0,-3500,1)
Exception raised:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/doctest.py"
Hi,
I agree that the current histogram should be changed. However, I am not
sure 1.0.5 is the correct release for that.
David, this doesn't work for your code:
r= np.array([1,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5,5])
dbin=[2,3,4]
rc, rb=histogram(r, bins=dbin, discard=None)
Returns:
rc=[3 3] # Really should
Hi,
Thanks, but it's been my experience that formatting FP numbers into
decimal causes a lot of false alarms
all by itself; that is, you get different decimal representations of the
same FP memory value. I've had this happen
often enough that I found the first thing I did when an output
diffe
Will set_printoptions not work for you?
http://www.scipy.org/Numpy_Example_List_With_Doc#head-cc1302f5e9e57de71b578cf25e8a9ffd8aa3a707>
hth,
Alan Isaac
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/list
Hi Folks,
I'm pretty new to Numpy, and I hope someone can help me out with a
couple newbie questions.
First, I'd like, for diagnostic purposes, to print arrays of floating
point numbers in a format of my
choosing. Specifically, I have a formatting function that generates
strings which rep
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 06:15:25AM -0600, Steven H. Rogers wrote:
> At the IPython Sprint in Boulder last year Fernando suggested that
> someone look at this issue. I've given it some thought and started a
> wiki page for it. Inputs would be welcome and might motivate me to find
> the time to
Hans,
Note that the current histogram is buggy, in the sense that it assumes that
all bins have the same width and computes db = bins[1]-bin[0]. This is why
you get zeros everywhere.
The current behavior has been heavily criticized and I think we should
change it. My proposal is to have for histo
Perry Greenfield wrote:
> ...
> Some random comments:
>
> 1) It seems to me that the primary problem people have with a big
> flat namespace is that it makes the output of dir() long and
> unusable, and by implication, that a nice hierarchical organization
> would make it easier for people to
Am Dienstag, 25. März 2008 15:33:58 schrieb Chris Withers:
> > Because in your particular case, you're inspecting elements one by one,
> > and then, your masked data becomes the masked singleton which is a
> > special value.
>
> I'd argue that the masked singleton having a different fill value to t
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2008 20:57:30 schrieb Alexander Michael:
> Incidentally, while ones_like appears to play nice with derived
> classes, empty_like and zeros_like do not seem to do the same.
Shouldn't this be fixed? (Obviously, this stems from the fact that ones_like
is implemented in C, whil
Am Montag, 07. April 2008 14:34:08 schrieb Hans Meine:
> Am Samstag, 05. April 2008 21:54:27 schrieb Anne Archibald:
> > There's also a fourth option - raise an exception if any points are
> > outside the range.
>
> +1
>
> I think this should be the default. Otherwise, I tend towards "exclude",
>
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Gael Varoquaux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:52:45PM -0500, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> > This discussion is interesting, but it is really better suited for 1.1,
> > isn't it?
>
> Yes. The original dicussion was about adding simple financi
30 matches
Mail list logo
