Re: [Numpy-discussion] Forcing the use of -lgfortran

2008-04-05 Thread Andreas Klöckner
I can answer my own question now: 1) Option --fcompiler=gnu95 2) Add the following to site.cfg [atlas] library_dirs = /users/kloeckner/mach/x86_64/pool/lib,/usr/lib atlas_libs = lapack, f77blas, cblas, atlas Andreas On Sonntag 06 April 2008, Andreas Klöckner wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm having trou

[Numpy-discussion] Forcing the use of -lgfortran

2008-04-05 Thread Andreas Klöckner
Hi all, I'm having trouble getting numpy to compile something usable on a cluster I'm using, in particular I see 8< - ImportError: /users/kloeckner/mach/x86_64/pool/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so: undefined symbol: _

Re: [Numpy-discussion] matrix power (was: matrix multiply)

2008-04-05 Thread Anne Archibald
On 05/04/2008, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some discussion recently took place around raising a square matrices > to integer powers. See ticket #601: > > http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/601 > > Anne Archibald wrote a patch which factored 'matrix_multiply' out of > de

[Numpy-discussion] matrix multiply

2008-04-05 Thread Stéfan van der Walt
Hi all, Some discussion recently took place around raising a square matrices to integer powers. See ticket #601: http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/601 Anne Archibald wrote a patch which factored 'matrix_multiply' out of defmatrix (the matrix power implemented for the Matrix class). After som

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Final push for NumPy 1.0.5 (I need your help!)

2008-04-05 Thread Anne Archibald
On 05/04/2008, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > More generally, my local working copy is now rater divergent from the > > upstream. What's the recommended way to deal with this? Make sure I > > have all th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Final push for NumPy 1.0.5 (I need your help!)

2008-04-05 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/04/2008, James Philbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've posted patches for: > > > > #630: If float('123.45') works, so should numpy.float32('123.45') > > #581: random.set_state does not reset state of random.sta

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Final push for NumPy 1.0.5 (I need your help!)

2008-04-05 Thread Anne Archibald
On 05/04/2008, James Philbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've posted patches for: > > #630: If float('123.45') works, so should numpy.float32('123.45') > #581: random.set_state does not reset state of random.standard_normal Patches for #601, #622, #692, #696, #717 now in trac; I'd like to do so

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ticket #605 Incorrect behavior of numpy.histogram

2008-04-05 Thread Anne Archibald
On 05/04/2008, Bruce Southey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Should the first bin contain all values less than or equal to the > value of the first limit and the last bin contain all values greater > than the value of the last limit? > This produced the counts as: array([3, 3, 9]) (I termed th

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Ticket #605 Incorrect behavior of numpy.histogram

2008-04-05 Thread James Philbin
The matlab behaviour is to extend the first bin to include all data down to -inf and extend the last bin to handle all data to inf. This is probably the behaviour with least suprise. Therefor, I would vote +1 for behaviour #1 by default, +1 for keeping the old behaviour #2 around as an option and

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Final push for NumPy 1.0.5 (I need your help!)

2008-04-05 Thread James Philbin
I've posted patches for: #630: If float('123.45') works, so should numpy.float32('123.45') #581: random.set_state does not reset state of random.standard_normal James On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 04/04/2008, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Numpy-discussion] Ticket #605 Incorrect behavior of numpy.histogram

2008-04-05 Thread Bruce Southey
Hi, I have been investigating Ticket #605 'Incorrect behavior of numpy.histogram' (http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/ticket/605 ). The fix for this ticket really depends on what the expectations are for the bin limits and different applications have different behavior. Consequently, I think that feedba

Re: [Numpy-discussion] packaging scipy (was Re: Simple financial functions for NumPy)

2008-04-05 Thread Matthew Brett
> +1 (and s/students/colleagues). Surely you mean: s.replace('students', colleagues') ! Matthew ___ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Simple financial functions for NumPy

2008-04-05 Thread Neil Crighton
I'm just a numpy user, but for what it's worth, I would much prefer to have a single numpy namespace with a small as possible number of objects inside that namespace. To me, 'as small as possible' means that it only includes the array and associated array manipulation functions (searchsorted, where