There is some ugly code in _compiled_base.c and what look to be duplicate
functions. Do we really need it?
Chuck
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Numpy-discussion@scipy.org
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Question,
The current string compare doesn't work correctly with strings containing
zeros, so I have replaced it in various spots with a working version. I
think this should be added to the array_api to match up with
PyArray_CompareUCS4. However, I notice that that the multiarray_api_order
and arr
On Feb 9, 2008 3:19 PM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > I'm also thinking that at some point it becomes more efficient to do
> > a indirect sort followed by take than to move all those big strings
> > around. But I guess we wo
A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> I'm also thinking that at some point it becomes more efficient to do
> a indirect sort followed by take than to move all those big strings
> around. But I guess we won't know where that point is until we have
> both versions available.
I've
On Feb 9, 2008 2:42 PM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2008 2:29 PM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Chuck,
> >
> > One more thing on this. I've been doing some benchmarking with my
> > opt_memcpy() macro in the quicksort_string function, and I should
On Feb 9, 2008 2:29 PM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> One more thing on this. I've been doing some benchmarking with my
> opt_memcpy() macro in the quicksort_string function, and I should say
> that while it is definitely more efficient than my system memcpy for
> small v
A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> On Feb 9, 2008 2:07 PM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > > > So, strncmp1 is not only faster than its C counterpart, but
> > > > also the one doing the correct job with
Chuck,
One more thing on this. I've been doing some benchmarking with my
opt_memcpy() macro in the quicksort_string function, and I should say
that while it is definitely more efficient than my system memcpy for
small values of n (the number of bytes to copy), this doesn't keep true
for all v
On Feb 9, 2008 2:07 PM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > > So, strncmp1 is not only faster than its C counterpart, but also
> > > the one doing the correct job with NumPy (unicode) strings.
> >
> > Ah, in that case the current
A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > So, strncmp1 is not only faster than its C counterpart, but also
> > the one doing the correct job with NumPy (unicode) strings.
>
> Ah, in that case the current indirect sort for NumPy strings, which
> uses strncmp, is incorrect and needs
On Feb 9, 2008 11:50 AM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > > Well, for the unicode case it wouldn't be enough by replacing
> > > 'char' by 'Py_ArrayUCS4'? Maybe this afternoon I can do some
> > > benchmarking too in this regard
Eric Firing wrote:
> David,
>
> When I try to build numscons-0.3.4 from the tarball, I get:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "setup.py", line 74, in
> import release as R
> ImportError: No module named release
>
> Where should the "release" module be coming from? I've never h
A Saturday 09 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > Well, for the unicode case it wouldn't be enough by replacing
> > 'char' by 'Py_ArrayUCS4'? Maybe this afternoon I can do some
> > benchmarking too in this regard.
>
> Looks like that for Numpy. The problem I was thinking about is that
>
David,
When I try to build numscons-0.3.4 from the tarball, I get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 74, in
import release as R
ImportError: No module named release
Where should the "release" module be coming from? I've never heard of
it before.
Eric
David Co
On Feb 9, 2008 6:47 AM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A Friday 08 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > On Feb 8, 2008 10:31 AM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > A Friday 08 February 2008, Francesc Altet escrigué:
> > > > A Friday 08 February 2008, Charles R Ha
Hi,
Since numscons is now available on the trunk, more people can easily
try it out. I put some basic instructions there, mainly how to get
started and how to easily modify compilation flags, as well as a list of
supported platforms
http://scipy.org/scipy/numpy/wiki/Numcons
I will add mor
A Friday 08 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> On Feb 8, 2008 10:31 AM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A Friday 08 February 2008, Francesc Altet escrigué:
> > > A Friday 08 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > > > > Also, in the context of my work in indexing, and b
A Friday 08 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> On Feb 8, 2008 8:58 AM, Francesc Altet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A Friday 08 February 2008, Charles R Harris escrigué:
> > > > Also, in the context of my work in indexing, and because of the
> > > > slowness of the current implementation
David Huard wrote:
> Jarrod and David,
>
> I am reporting a success on FC8, Xeon. Some tests don't pass, but I
> don't believe it is related to the build process.
If you did not have tests failing before, then it may be a regression,
so do not hesitate to open a ticket,
cheers,
David
__
rex wrote:
> After doing the necessary fix for distutils, svn4774 builds with
> gcc, but trying to build with icc with:
>
> python setup.py config --compiler=intel build_clib --compiler=intel build_ext
> --compiler=intel install > inst.log
>
> fails with:
>
> Running from numpy source directory.
rex wrote:
> This is the 3rd time I have reported this problem and a fix.
>
There is no need for a fix, this can be done wo touching distutils. See
site.cfg.example, there is a mention at the end.
cheers,
David
___
Numpy-discussion mailing list
Nump
Reading the tutorial
http://scipy.org/Cookbook/Theoretical_Ecology/Hastings_and_Powell
I've tried to run the provided code.
But compiling the fortran module with the line command given in the
tuto, I've got the following traceback (you can see it with syntax
highlighting at http://paste.debian.net
22 matches
Mail list logo
