Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to write 2D Ising model simulation into my school, so I wrote
> it in Python, then rewrote it in Fortran + f2py, and also Cython:
>
> http://hg.sharesource.org/isingmodel/
>
> And Cython solution is 2x faster than f2py. I understand, that I am
> comparing many
On Dec 23, 2007 2:29 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to write 2D Ising model simulation into my school, so I wrote
> it in Python, then rewrote it in Fortran + f2py, and also Cython:
>
> http://hg.sharesource.org/isingmodel/
>
> And Cython solution is 2x faster than f2
Hi,
I need to write 2D Ising model simulation into my school, so I wrote
it in Python, then rewrote it in Fortran + f2py, and also Cython:
http://hg.sharesource.org/isingmodel/
And Cython solution is 2x faster than f2py. I understand, that I am
comparing many things - wrappers, my fortran coding
Hi Eric
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:13:13AM -1000, Eric Firing wrote:
> I think the description of the putmask difference is missing the point.
> The real difference is not in the way the third argument is handled,
> or its required shape, but in whether the mask is updated or not.
This behav
